While this evidence provides his attorney a solid argument that the prosecution sought to push Michael Flynn to lie, that might not be enough to carry the day with Judge Sullivan.
Two passages in Judge Emmet Sullivan’s decision, separated by scores of pages in the tedious 99-page opinion, make clear that the outcome was a forgone conclusion.
With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
The question is whether Michael Flynn was affected by efforts to get Trump, and whether Judge Sullivan will keep him from reviewing the evidence that could prove prosecutorial misconduct.
There are rules against using the power and authority of a prosecutor to smear a defendant without giving him his day in court.
The records expose efforts by special counsel attorney Andrew Weissmann to intimidate witnesses and to interfere in the attorney-client relationship of a cooperating witness.
- Why Criminal Prosecution Might Be The Least Of Ilhan Omar’s Legal ConcernsRep. Ilhan Omar needs competent immigration counsel to continue reading >
- In Royal Showdown, Queen Elizabeth Bests Meghan MarkleHarry is alleged to have yelled at staff, ‘What Meghacontinue reading >
- How A Feminist Juror’s Lies Could Get Harvey Weinstein’s Conviction Tossed OutIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce that a pcontinue reading >