By opening his courtroom to John Gleeson and other anti-Flynn amici, Judge Sullivan has converted the judicial branch into an emissary of the Democratic Party.
New documents in the Michael Flynn case cemented that a small cadre of high-level FBI agents set a perjury trap for President Trump’s then-national security advisor.
While this evidence provides his attorney a solid argument that the prosecution sought to push Michael Flynn to lie, that might not be enough to carry the day with Judge Sullivan.
Two passages in Judge Emmet Sullivan’s decision, separated by scores of pages in the tedious 99-page opinion, make clear that the outcome was a forgone conclusion.
With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
The question is whether Michael Flynn was affected by efforts to get Trump, and whether Judge Sullivan will keep him from reviewing the evidence that could prove prosecutorial misconduct.
There are rules against using the power and authority of a prosecutor to smear a defendant without giving him his day in court.
The records expose efforts by special counsel attorney Andrew Weissmann to intimidate witnesses and to interfere in the attorney-client relationship of a cooperating witness.
- How The Rachel Levine ‘Four-Star Admiral’ Photo-Op Will Damage U.S. SecurityWhile maneuvering his Third Army to relieve Bastogne ducontinue reading >
- How Virginia Democrats Are Working To Make Elections Sloppy AgainIt doesn't matter if Republicans get a wave in 2021 andcontinue reading >
- Columbia Law Professor Explains Why Public Schools Are Tearing America ApartLegal scholar Philip Hamburger explains why public schocontinue reading >