‘It’s outrageous that the FEC has sat around and done nothing—especially with such a detailed, comprehensive paper trail handed to them,’ lawyer Dan Backer told The Federalist.
The DNC offered no explanation or condemnation of several march leaders’ well-documented history of anti-Semitism, yet it is no longer listed as a march ‘sponsor.’
In a parallel universe in which the law is applied without regard to politics, it would be not only Michael Cohen who is prosecuted for his legal transgressions.
Nations, not unlike families, need to have some sense of identity, even purpose. When a group of people is defined as everyone and anyone, that actually means that it is no one.
Senate Democrats refuse to even acknowledge the domestic abuse allegation made against Ellison by his ex-girlfriend Karen Monahan.
Overstating the impact of Russia’s influence on the 2016 election is not only dishonest, it helps Vladimir Putin achieve his meddling goals.
There’s a big difference between the two.
Contrary to the mainstream media’s narrative, Robert Mueller’s latest indictment does not implicate President Trump, but exonerate him.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and others embarrassed by DOJ’s actions are shielded by the never-ending nature of the investigation.
Dodging the question doesn’t make it go away: Did Hillary Clinton, dozens of Democratic Party officials, and hundreds of liberal mega-donors break the law?
‘Oh my g-d,’ one man says in audio of the moment the news broke inside a Democratic National Committee meeting. A woman can be heard moaning in the background.
The DNC has laid itself bare to a potentially disastrous discovery process that could expose the Russia-hacking and collusion stories as carefully orchestrated falsehoods.
The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.
The Democratic National Committee just filed a civil suit in the Southern District of New York against the Russian government, members of the Trump campaign, and WikiLeaks.
More big details will likely come from twin U.S. libel lawsuits on a Democrat-funded opposition research dossier from a former British spy used to authorize spying on a U.S. citizen.
Congress requires the FISA court to maintain a pool of lawyers friendly to civil liberties who are willing to challenge the Justice Department’s applications for a spy warrant. But the court almost never uses them.
‘I’ve been watching the Clintons work for 30 years. That’s all the evidence I need,’ my dad told me months ago about the Russia story. The evidence is increasingly proving him right.
Democrats and media are trying to deflect from the House memo by saying the Russia investigation really started in July 2016. That argument doesn’t work in their favor.
Her campaign is linked to at least three separate pieces of information fed to the FBI, including the dossier the FBI used as a pretext to spy on a Trump campaign associate.
The memo asserts the FBI and DOJ scrubbed the Steele dossier of relevant political context when presenting it to the FISA court as a basis for a surveillance warrant.
- Democrats Take Down Another Judicial Nominee Simply Because He’s A ChristianReligious tests are unacceptable––we should never lcontinue reading >
- Lee Child’s Latest Takes A Trip Through Jack Reacher’s Unrecognizable AmericaAfter 23 Jack Reacher books, Lee Child continues to selcontinue reading >
- The Pedophile Project: Your 7-Year-Old Is Next On The Sexual Revolution’s Hit ParadeWe cannot dismiss the campaign to legalize pedophilia acontinue reading >