A Bill Clinton-appointed judge dismissed a case that, at its core, was a private effort to punish and deter free speech because it embarrassed the left.
Recently released transcripts of congressional testimony now raise the specter that the FBI also used Nellie Ohr’s opposition research in the FISA applications.
The field will be too large for party elders to manage. Now they must figure out how to maximize its impact, and the key to it is how the Democratic National Committee structures its debates.
When are Republicans going to stop playing by two sets of rules?
‘It’s outrageous that the FEC has sat around and done nothing—especially with such a detailed, comprehensive paper trail handed to them,’ lawyer Dan Backer told The Federalist.
The DNC offered no explanation or condemnation of several march leaders’ well-documented history of anti-Semitism, yet it is no longer listed as a march ‘sponsor.’
In a parallel universe in which the law is applied without regard to politics, it would be not only Michael Cohen who is prosecuted for his legal transgressions.
Nations, not unlike families, need to have some sense of identity, even purpose. When a group of people is defined as everyone and anyone, that actually means that it is no one.
Senate Democrats refuse to even acknowledge the domestic abuse allegation made against Ellison by his ex-girlfriend Karen Monahan.
Overstating the impact of Russia’s influence on the 2016 election is not only dishonest, it helps Vladimir Putin achieve his meddling goals.
There’s a big difference between the two.
Contrary to the mainstream media’s narrative, Robert Mueller’s latest indictment does not implicate President Trump, but exonerate him.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and others embarrassed by DOJ’s actions are shielded by the never-ending nature of the investigation.
Dodging the question doesn’t make it go away: Did Hillary Clinton, dozens of Democratic Party officials, and hundreds of liberal mega-donors break the law?
‘Oh my g-d,’ one man says in audio of the moment the news broke inside a Democratic National Committee meeting. A woman can be heard moaning in the background.
The DNC has laid itself bare to a potentially disastrous discovery process that could expose the Russia-hacking and collusion stories as carefully orchestrated falsehoods.
The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.
The Democratic National Committee just filed a civil suit in the Southern District of New York against the Russian government, members of the Trump campaign, and WikiLeaks.
More big details will likely come from twin U.S. libel lawsuits on a Democrat-funded opposition research dossier from a former British spy used to authorize spying on a U.S. citizen.
Congress requires the FISA court to maintain a pool of lawyers friendly to civil liberties who are willing to challenge the Justice Department’s applications for a spy warrant. But the court almost never uses them.
- Why Criminal Prosecution Might Be The Least Of Ilhan Omar’s Legal ConcernsRep. Ilhan Omar needs competent immigration counsel to continue reading >
- In Royal Showdown, Queen Elizabeth Bests Meghan MarkleHarry is alleged to have yelled at staff, ‘What Meghacontinue reading >
- How A Feminist Juror’s Lies Could Get Harvey Weinstein’s Conviction Tossed OutIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce that a pcontinue reading >