Democrats on the January 6 inquisition are setting up a massive and murky legal fight over executive privilege, legal experts and insiders told The Federalist.
The fact the client owned a gun and had firearm permits was enough to label him as reasonably certain to cause death or serious bodily harm and report him to the police.
There are rules against using the power and authority of a prosecutor to smear a defendant without giving him his day in court.
This cooked-up pretext to invade the president’s attorney-client privilege is a stain of shame on the rule of law and tramples on a 500-year-old rule that protects our common law tradition.
In his obsessive pursuit of President Trump, Robert Mueller has deprived Trump of his right to the counsel of his choice. Setting this precedent for Trump sets it for everyone.
A friend of James Comey who leaked classified documents at Comey’s request now claims to be the former FBI director’s personal attorney.
- The Supreme Court’s Originalist Justices Should Allow Bad Abortion Law To Die By Its Own HandThese same considerations that Casey relied upon nearlycontinue reading >
- Dallas Students Riot Amid Rising Violence In Public Schools NationwideWhen Dallas administrators let sexual assault allegatiocontinue reading >
- How The FBI Raid On Project Veritas Helped Protect The New York TimesThe FBI's raids on Project Veritas had the effect of prcontinue reading >