You’ll fall in love with our ultrasoft and highly problematic tee. Get them before they’re gone!
We are excited to announce this big step for The Federalist Radio Hour, and proud to be a part of the outstanding line-up at Panoply Media.
Salman Rushdie, Walter Russell Mead, and Federalist writers will discuss the loss of trust in institutions that guard democracy in NYC on Saturday.
It’s been a big month at The Federalist, in part because it’s the end of the world as we know it, but we feel fine.
A regime that seeks “equality for all and special favors for none” may leave many challenges, but America is up to them.
Speculating about President Obama’s legacy will keep political pundits busy over the next two years.
Who needs to arm a mob with swords when you can tame and incite it with laughter.
The structural limitations of the Constitution have all disappeared, swallowed up by ideas like “commerce,” “general welfare,” and “necessary and proper.”
The GOP often concedes too much to the courts–a notion of judicial supremacy at odds with the best of the Republican Party’s history.
For a politics guided by constitutional definitions, not polls or power-plays.
Roe v. Wade is no ordinary case of judicial activism. The Court landed on the wrong side of the first principle of justice: “all men are created equal.”
Let’s hope the Roberts Court chooses constitutional judgment over Progressive will.
What will it take for Republicans in Congress to limit the president’s executive overreach? Simply the will to use the constitutional tools they possess.
Playing by the normal rules, the least likely outcome in 2016 is a victory by a Republican presidential insurgent.
Who among the current Republican contenders is best positioned to make the case for this understanding of the American presidency–and then live up to it in office?
Treating voters as if they are ‘an enlightened and rational people’ might just produce a Republican presidential candidate worthy of the name.
Half of the Democratic senators who voted for Obamacare just five years ago are now gone, seventeen of whom were replaced by Republicans.
A president who can see the right moment and is willing to seize it can promote the public peace with a timely act of mercy.
Republicans would be better off if they spent more time figuring out how to use a legislative veto and less time making idle threats.
The bottom line for this, as for any institutional question, is this: is American liberty more secure with a presidential term limit or without?
- Biden: Hero Who Stopped Texas Church Shooter Was Wrong To Have A GunJoe Biden says the hero who stopped the Texas church shcontinue reading >
- To Avoid Debacles Like Roy Moore, Repeal The 17th AmendmentVoters in Alabama might send Roy Moore to the U.S. Senacontinue reading >
- Liberals’ Sudden Concern About Bill Clinton’s Behavior Is Cynical And Self-ServingA number of liberals have finally decided to take allegcontinue reading >