Rejecting the climate-change panic-mongers might have been one of the smartest things American voters have done over the past two decades.
The New York Times sudden realizes that Paul Ehrlich is a charlatan, but they don’t learn the full lesson.
Why not believe the environmentalists on global warming? Because they have a long history of failed predictions and bogus prognostications of doom.
Why does Hollywood continue to make movies based on discredited environmental theories rather than optimistic ones about human potential?
- Baby Dies Because Doctors Were Told His Pregnant Mother Was A ManSuch tragic unintended consequences should be expected continue reading >
- Ralph Northam Thinks Voters Are A Bunch Of Gullible FoolsAt this point, Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam should be chcontinue reading >
- Media Scrambles To Discredit Abby Johnson’s Pro-Life Conversion, And FailsWhy don’t the same reporters who have invested so muccontinue reading >