In a rare move, a three-judge panel ordered the presiding judge in the criminal case against Flynn to respond to his attorney’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
New facts in the Michael Flynn case call into question the voluntariness of Flynn’s plea. Judge Sullivan should dismiss the charges to send a clear message: Outrageous prosecutorial coercion will not be tolerated.
Flynn’s case, already of significant interest to conservatives, will now likely have the full attention of the D.C. legal profession and ethics experts nationwide.
Sidney Powell exposed several more troubling details about the prosecution of Flynn, involving both the special counsel team and Flynn’s previous attorneys.
This dispute between the prosecution and the defendant is genuine and passionate and reflects their completely divergent views of the relevant facts.
If there is to be a just result in Flynn’s case, the court must address the question about Covington’s conflict of interest. Flynn shouldn’t be punished for mistakes that are attributable to his counsel rather than to him.
His former lawyer’s latest testimony establishes two facts, both of which benefit Michael Flynn and both of which the media has missed.
In the escalating dispute between government attorneys and former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn’s new lawyer, the latter has the better argument.
- Russell Crowe Is Right, If You Think ‘Master And Commander’ Is Boring, You Need To Grow UpThe 2003 epic film about masculine virtue isn’t for wcontinue reading >
- Chuck Schumer Endorses Biden’s Plan To Force Public Schools To Allow Males In Female BathroomsBiden has promised to grant transgender students' privicontinue reading >
- Federal Judge Releases BLM Capitol Rioter Without BailDemocrats including Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck continue reading >