These events should anger any red-blooded American who believes in representative democracy and the importance of the rule of law.
An examination of the George Papadopolous explanation for its Russia-Trump collusion investigation shows that the public evidence doesn’t fit the FBI’s story.
There is no indication of collusion, but there is evidence Rod Rosenstein’s appointment of a special counsel violated the Constitution, federal regulations, and his authority.
Gowdy claimed that the FBI’s use of spies against the Trump campaign was perfectly proper, but multiple reports indicate he never even saw the full records Congress subpoenaed on the matter.
My fellow Democrats are increasingly becoming the kind of low-information voters they despise and think are only on the other side.
In a statement released Wednesday, Sen. John Kennedy called for the ongoing Department of Justice probe led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller to end.
While claims that the FBI properly inquired of connections between the Trump campaign and Russia were valid to a point, that point has long since passed.
If the Justice Department is as incorruptible as its defenders claim, why are they freaking out about an inquiry into the Donald Trump investigation?
Federal officials have provided more information to reporters at New York Times and Washington Post than they have in response to a congressional subpoena.
What was once a no-downside case for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office has now become one with little upside.
Did Joseph Mifsud use George Papadopoulos as a pawn to set up Donald Trump? Did he feed Papadopoulos information about Russia to see how the Trump campaign responded?
Beyond the news that Robert Mueller’s charges against Paul Manafort were unrelated to Russian meddling, the government only decided to indict Manafort after Mueller took over.
The alleged lack of evidence would be in sharp contrast to the repeated leaks from anonymous but highly placed government officials that led to the appointment of a special counsel.
The DNC has laid itself bare to a potentially disastrous discovery process that could expose the Russia-hacking and collusion stories as carefully orchestrated falsehoods.
The Democratic National Committee just filed a civil suit in the Southern District of New York against the Russian government, members of the Trump campaign, and WikiLeaks.
The consequences of ‘fake news’ from trusted media outlets can be astonishingly severe, as evidenced by a report that Trump nearly fired Bob Mueller over an erroneous story.
If the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s lawyer is about what we think it’s about, we could be living through a rerun of the Clinton impeachment crisis.
Whether someone is a ‘target’ as opposed to a ‘subject’ of an investigation is a distinction without a difference.
- How Bruce Ohr Could Implicate High-Ranking Obama Officials In SpygateReporting on Bruce Ohr suggests DOJ and FBI employees ocontinue reading >
- Bruce Ohr May Have Broken More Than The Law By Pushing His Wife’s Opposition Research To The FBIDid Ohr 'personally and substantially' participate in acontinue reading >
- This Cake Baker Won At The Supreme Court. Now The State Is Trying To Get RevengeColorado is trying to compel the same baker who just wocontinue reading >