An ambiguous, unverifiable climate crisis that only the state has the means or authority to combat is a blank check to power.
Elizabeth Warren dished out a climate change agenda that is as improbable as it is expensive, then turned around and insulted WWII vets.
The New York Times informed us the connection between climate change and hurricanes wasn’t clear. That’s the kind of skepticism that gets serious people branded ‘deniers.’
On the eve of the Climate March, the New York Times ran Stephens’s first column for them, and it sent the climate mob on a virtual stampede with torches ablaze.
Correctly acknowledging the climate change debate is enough to get EPA nominee Scott Pruitt branded a ‘denialist.’ Why would anyone take such a clownish ideology seriously?
The media is having a fainting spell over Trump’s quip that Hillary would go to jail for her emails, but they forget Democrats are the ones who throw the book at their opponents all the time.
- Let’s Stop Pretending Every Impeachment Witness Is A Selfless HeroIt’s become clear that some witnesses in the impeachmcontinue reading >
- Vindman Just Admitted To Leaking To The Anti-Trump WhistleblowerWhen pressed on who Vindman spoke with about the call, continue reading >
- Vindman Exaggerated His Resume In Prepared Congressional StatementVindman claimed to be the “principal advisor to the Ncontinue reading >