Science-based thinking is a valuable tool: it tells us what we can do. But it cannot say a word about what we ought to do.
It’s likely that most Americans have little recollection of where they were or what they were doing when they learned about Steve Scalise and the others who had been wounded. Why?
The solution to bad speech is not more speech when nobody agrees on the ground rules. We cannot have a marketplace of ideas without rules of engagement.
If it is accurate to call both conservative Paul Ryan and progressive Elizabeth Warren extremists, does that mean the right thing to do is to average out their ideological differences?
‘Preventing death’ and ‘ensuring welfare’ are two different things and thus correspond with different kinds of individual and social responsibilities.
The film’s egotistical celestial is exactly the sort of figure atheists condemn. Thankfully, whatever else the Christian God may be, he is not Ego.
While ‘total inclusion in the community’ may sound good as a fundamental moral principle, running it through the logic machine yields some problematic results.
- It’s Not Just West Point. U.S. Military Academies Have Become Disneyland For PoliticiansThe service academies are now the vanity projects of thcontinue reading >
- Trump’s Executive Moves Have Strengthened Checks And BalancesSay what you will about Donald Trump -- and there’s pcontinue reading >
- New Bipartisan Bump Stock Bill Would Actually Ban All Semi-Automatic RiflesA new congressional proposal to ban bump stocks in the continue reading >