The judiciary’s rulings are not the supreme law of the land, even rulings from the Supreme Court. The judiciary is not the only or even final arbiter on the Constitution.
We are seeing federal judges repeatedly issue nationwide injunctions halting government operations that the judges deem politically incorrect.
What is more in accord with the rule of law: four justices usurping the power of a co-equal branch of government, or a legislature doing exactly what the state constitution allows?
When a president or legislature is faced with following either a court ruling they know has no constitutional basis or the actual Constitution, they should heed Hamilton’s advice.
Judges—who typically lack military service and work in courtrooms far removed from its realities—are ill-positioned and ill-qualified to evaluate judgment calls by military leaders.
A federal judge in Hawaii relied on his feelings and flawed interpretation of Trump’s campaign rhetoric to block his latest travel ban.
If widely embraced, judicial engagement would give constitutional conservatives something to get genuinely excited about.
- How CNN Set Me Up For The Near-Riot Parkland Town HallCNN treated the town hall as if it were a professional continue reading >
- WATCH: ABC’s David Wright Admits Network Doesn’t Care About NewsIn a newly released Project Veritas video, footage revecontinue reading >
- Why Bernie Sanders As Democrats’ Nominee Would Be Best For The CountryThe socialists are here. The only way to change that iscontinue reading >