The judiciary’s rulings are not the supreme law of the land, even rulings from the Supreme Court. The judiciary is not the only or even final arbiter on the Constitution.
We are seeing federal judges repeatedly issue nationwide injunctions halting government operations that the judges deem politically incorrect.
What is more in accord with the rule of law: four justices usurping the power of a co-equal branch of government, or a legislature doing exactly what the state constitution allows?
When a president or legislature is faced with following either a court ruling they know has no constitutional basis or the actual Constitution, they should heed Hamilton’s advice.
Judges—who typically lack military service and work in courtrooms far removed from its realities—are ill-positioned and ill-qualified to evaluate judgment calls by military leaders.
A federal judge in Hawaii relied on his feelings and flawed interpretation of Trump’s campaign rhetoric to block his latest travel ban.
If widely embraced, judicial engagement would give constitutional conservatives something to get genuinely excited about.
- Stanford Faculty Smear Professor Who Accurately Summarized Data On MasksOpen scientific discourse is especially critical duringcontinue reading >
- What The Right Needs Now Is The Courage To Fight Even If It Costs UsAll of a sudden, the conservative project is not a conscontinue reading >
- Top CDC Official Steps Down Weeks After Emails Surface Showing Collusion With Teachers UnionAnne Schuchat, the CDC's principal deputy director, wascontinue reading >