Jane Robbins is an attorney and a retired senior fellow with the American Principles Project in Washington DC. In that position she crafted federal and state legislation designed to restore the constitutional autonomy of states and parents in education policy, and to protect the rights of religious freedom and conscience. She is a graduate of Clemson University and the Harvard Law School.
Parents who object that trans bathroom policies endanger their daughters are dismissed as ‘transphobic.’ But parental warnings have been tragically borne out.
Parents shouldn’t allow themselves to be bullied into agreeing to radical, experimental medical procedures they know deep down are bad for their child.
When all babies’ DNA is stored forever and accessible to whoever has the most money or political clout, no one’s most fundamental privacy is secure.
Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy is the picture of what happens when a physician values political advocacy to the detriment of medical ethics and professionalism.
The most noteworthy aspect of Tandy Aye’s discussion is her concession that the doctors who administer ‘gender affirming therapy’ are sterilizing these children.
Transgender activists hurry to deny and hide these crucial scientific findings. Almost makes you think they only care about pushing a political agenda.
Given the undeniable medical and psychological risks of administering opposite-sex hormones, the physicians question how any child, adolescent, or parent can give truly informed consent.
As much as transgender ideologues disguised as doctors want to claim otherwise, some drugs pose serious and lasting risks to children.
The more this information comes out, the more the public can understand what’s really going on with the debate over treatment for gender dysphoria.
Thirty-three of these girls were under 18 at the time of surgeries a taxpayer-funded researcher is studying to validate transgenderism. Two were only 13 years old, and five were only 14.
Chinese companies are buying up U.S. companies that store mammoth personal data on American children and adults. National-security analysts are starting to take notice.
The proposition that the federal government should be entrusted with even more information on citizens is a bit of a high-stakes gamble.
Do we really want a society in which every action a child takes from K-12 is incorporated into an economic planning algorithm that may control the rest of his life?
In many ways, the progressive education establishment is akin to a leftist “Hive”—people who think and speak alike and move in concert, even without centralized control Read Full Article >
Government of the people and by the people should not plumb and manipulate the people’s psyches and emotions, especially when many kids can still hardly read and cipher.
- New York Times’ Trump Tax Return ‘Bombshell’ Is A JokeIf this is the big pre-debate 'gotcha' that the Democracontinue reading >
- The Left Hates Amy Coney Barrett Because She Disproves All Their Lies About WomenHer very existence repudiates the left's binary thinkincontinue reading >
- Mask Fanatics Have Officially Abandoned Science To Control Your LifeThis is our world in 2020: Not even the experts can keecontinue reading >