There are only two flaws with antagonistic lawyer Michael Avenatti’s argument for indicting President Trump: It has no basis in fact, and it has no basis in law.
Why did President Obama feel the need to stress his commitment to ensuring the Russia investigation was handled ‘by the book’ just a month before he left office?
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
- New York Times Hid Multiple Key Facts In Kavanaugh Yearbook HitA New York Times article scrutinizing inside jokes in tcontinue reading >
- Republicans Have A Simple Choice: Vote To Confirm Kavanaugh Or Get Slaughtered In NovemberThe calculus isn't complicated. Republicans can stand ucontinue reading >
- The Smearing Of Brett Kavanaugh Is Truly EvilThis media-enabled Democratic smear campaign simply cancontinue reading >