With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
‘This was another case without a crime—brought by prosecutors who were willing to criminalize innocent behavior in furtherance of their own agenda,’ says Sidney Powell.
New information shows the intelligence community withheld extremely relevant information from the special counsel’s office. What else did it withhold? Robert Mueller should say.
His former lawyer’s latest testimony establishes two facts, both of which benefit Michael Flynn and both of which the media has missed.
In the escalating dispute between government attorneys and former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn’s new lawyer, the latter has the better argument.
Was there a conflict of interest between Michael Flynn and his Covington and Burling attorneys who used to represent him? New facts unfold.
- Schiff Learned Of Russian ‘Bounty’ Intelligence In February, Withheld Information From Congress, And Took No ActionTop committee staff for Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), thcontinue reading >
- 5 Ways You Can Fight Back In The Cultural Civil WarIt can be hard for ordinary Americans who oppose the racontinue reading >
- Americans Should Never Again Comply With Pandemic Lockdown OrdersBy treating Black Lives Matters protests differently thcontinue reading >