While this evidence provides his attorney a solid argument that the prosecution sought to push Michael Flynn to lie, that might not be enough to carry the day with Judge Sullivan.
With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
‘This was another case without a crime—brought by prosecutors who were willing to criminalize innocent behavior in furtherance of their own agenda,’ says Sidney Powell.
New information shows the intelligence community withheld extremely relevant information from the special counsel’s office. What else did it withhold? Robert Mueller should say.
His former lawyer’s latest testimony establishes two facts, both of which benefit Michael Flynn and both of which the media has missed.
In the escalating dispute between government attorneys and former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn’s new lawyer, the latter has the better argument.
Was there a conflict of interest between Michael Flynn and his Covington and Burling attorneys who used to represent him? New facts unfold.
- Monday Was A Big Day For Democrats, But You Probably Missed ItWith America's anti-Trump voters and allied reporters icontinue reading >
- Oprah Joins Plot To Convince Americans Their Country Is RacistThis effort to extend the 1619 reeducation program intocontinue reading >
- Only Tom Hanks Could Have Made New WWII Drama ‘Greyhound’No fictional horror will ever compare to standing in a continue reading >