When Prager U decided to use the courts to impose First Amendment restrictions on YouTube, it was pursuing the ‘wrong’ solution, so the Ninth Circuit’s decision is hardly a surprise.
Any government regulation that restricts an platform’s authority to censor speech will, in fact, amount to a form of viewpoint censorship that will violate the platforms’ First Amendment rights.
- Mask Fanatics Have Officially Abandoned Science To Control Your LifeThis is our world in 2020: Not even the experts can keecontinue reading >
- ‘Trump Was Right’: Explosive New FBI Texts Detail Internal Furor Over Handling Of ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ InvestigationNewly disclosed internal FBI notes and text messages decontinue reading >
- Anticapitalist Sponsored By Twitter CEO Accuses Amy Coney Barrett Of ‘Colonialism’ For Adopting From Haiti'Some White colonizers 'adopted' Black children,' Kendicontinue reading >