When Prager U decided to use the courts to impose First Amendment restrictions on YouTube, it was pursuing the ‘wrong’ solution, so the Ninth Circuit’s decision is hardly a surprise.
Any government regulation that restricts an platform’s authority to censor speech will, in fact, amount to a form of viewpoint censorship that will violate the platforms’ First Amendment rights.
- NFL Legend Brett Favre Slams Woke Sports Leagues And Athletes Kneeling: ‘It’s A Shame’"Something’s got to unite us. And the games or sport continue reading >
- CBS’s Refusal To Even Explain Itself Is The New, Shameless Reality For Republicans And ConservativesWhat the story really says is that both CBS and '60 Mincontinue reading >
- PragerU Launched Pro-America Education For Kids, And The Left Is Freaking OutThe left fears elementary students loving the United Stcontinue reading >