Rejecting the climate-change panic-mongers might have been one of the smartest things American voters have done over the past two decades.
The New York Times sudden realizes that Paul Ehrlich is a charlatan, but they don’t learn the full lesson.
Why not believe the environmentalists on global warming? Because they have a long history of failed predictions and bogus prognostications of doom.
Why does Hollywood continue to make movies based on discredited environmental theories rather than optimistic ones about human potential?
- NYT Reveals FBI Retaliated Against Trump For Comey FiringA Friday expose from the New York Times reveals that thcontinue reading >
- Missing: Key Documents About Alleged Misconduct By Robert Mueller’s Lead ProsecutorLate Friday, a federal judge’s office confirmed that continue reading >
- Gillette’s Latest Commercial Is An Anti-Man Dumpster FireThe Gillette commercial is a diabolical failure from thcontinue reading >