Rejecting the climate-change panic-mongers might have been one of the smartest things American voters have done over the past two decades.
The New York Times sudden realizes that Paul Ehrlich is a charlatan, but they don’t learn the full lesson.
Why not believe the environmentalists on global warming? Because they have a long history of failed predictions and bogus prognostications of doom.
Why does Hollywood continue to make movies based on discredited environmental theories rather than optimistic ones about human potential?
- The Trump Administration Is Right To Define Gender BiologicallyThe federal government needs a definition of gender roocontinue reading >
- NYT: Jeff Sessions Is Doing A Great Job Fighting DOJ’s Liberal BureaucracyIntending to paint Jeff Sessions negatively, the Times continue reading >
- Here’s The Plot For The Next ‘Roseanne’ Reboot America NeedsOne fan had an idea: James Woods and Roseanne Barr teamcontinue reading >