Rejecting the climate-change panic-mongers might have been one of the smartest things American voters have done over the past two decades.
The New York Times sudden realizes that Paul Ehrlich is a charlatan, but they don’t learn the full lesson.
Why not believe the environmentalists on global warming? Because they have a long history of failed predictions and bogus prognostications of doom.
Why does Hollywood continue to make movies based on discredited environmental theories rather than optimistic ones about human potential?
- Socialism’s Bloody History Shows Millennials Should Think Twice Before Supporting ItSocialism demands that we place blind trust in whoever continue reading >
- Every Time Democrats Talk, I Want To Vote For Trump TwiceI am a highly motivated Trump voter because the Democracontinue reading >
- The Gun Control Campaign Against The AR-15 Is Full Of LiesPolitical efforts to ban the AR-15 are part of an increcontinue reading >