Its cuddly name aside, careful study of ‘Fairness for All’ legislation reveals that the proposed legislation is poorly conceived, demonstrably unfair, and wholly incapable of achieving its aims.
Why is Colin Kaepernick’s situation playing out in the court of public opinion while Jack Phillips’ is playing out in the Supreme Court of the United States?
Three years, one congressman, and a mountain of attorneys later, the National Park Service is doing the right thing for a Christian geologist.
The Supreme Court is set to determine whether government can exclude certain nonprofits from neutrally available public benefits solely because they are religious.
Obama-era rules empower meat inspectors to become speech inspectors, and that’s created a crazy situation at one farm in Michigan.
To forbid people from articulating beliefs and peacefully acting consistently with those beliefs is, at its core, an attempt to forbid the beliefs themselves.
Veterans and law enforcement personnel shouldn’t have to suffer this stigma. Their comfort is more important than Kaepernick’s free speech—right?
- NFL Commissioner: Trump’s Criticism Of NFL Players Who Kneel During Pledge Shows ‘Lack Of Respect’According to a recent J.D. Power survey, over a quartercontinue reading >
- The Confederate Statue Controversy Isn’t About Slavery, It’s About Ending AmericaAttacks on Confederate heritage have quickly evolved incontinue reading >
- This Trial Could Remove a Senator: You’ll Believe What CNN Did NextThe ongoing trial of Sen. Bob Menendez involves multi-mcontinue reading >