Search Results

…life to wreak revenge on Flynn for his service to Trump—and with a hope that Flynn’s demise would trigger Trump’s destruction. Justice for Flynn requires that those involved in this…

…be testimony from General Flynn. And from that testimony, the jury could draw a reasonable inference that there was a conspiracy, but we do not content that General Flynn was…

…his crime, noting that Flynn’s sentencing memo seemed to excuse Flynn’s conduct. Sullivan also quizzed Flynn on whether he wished to withdraw his guilty plea. Flynn held fast, though, telling…

…interview with General Flynn.” Comey said “no.” Rep. Trey Gowdy then asked Comey what Pientka and Strzok had relayed back concerning Flynn’s intent to deceive. “My recollection was,” Comey stated,…

…over Flynn’s representation, she has been demanding complete disclosure of all documentation surrounding the investigation into Flynn, but to no avail — that is, until Attorney General William Barr appointed…

…of Flynn’s call with Kislyak, however, established that Flynn did not in fact discuss sanctions with Kislyak. Rather, Flynn spoke of the possible expulsions of Russian diplomats. Yet the Statement…

…Flynn’s sentencing memorandum, Flynn did not fire his Covington and Burling attorneys following the December 2018 hearing. Now that Flynn’s cooperation is complete, all that seemingly remains is for Flynn…

…Senate immunity-for-testimony overtures to Flynn’s defense team after Flynn’s guilty plea. Earlier this week, evidence emerged that Flynn’s Covington lawyers had negotiated a secret side deal with prosecutors working for…

…and Peter Strzok—the latter of whom has since been fired—when the duo questioned Flynn on January 24, 2017, about Flynn’s December 2016 telephone conversations with the Russian ambassador. Flynn pleaded…

…show below, McCabe appears to have overruled Strzok’s initial impression of Flynn’s misstatements as unintentional, even though Strzok, not McCabe, had the benefit of actually witnessing Flynn’s demeanor. Flynn was…

…Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn. But the masterminds behind Spygate made a fatal mistake in casting Lokhova as a Russian operative with designs on Flynn, as her recently…

…its FARA services following resolution of the Flynn case. These conflicts, Powell argued, could not be waived. But even if Flynn could have waived Covington’s conflicts of interest, Flynn did…

…witnesses against Flynn, and no lawyer at the Covington firm could represent Flynn with respect to the FARA charge. If, instead, Flynn innocently provided incorrect or incomplete information to Covington,…

…Jensen to recommend the charge against Flynn be dismissed. Yates’ entire basis for declaring the questioning of Flynn “legitimate” was her “impression” that the FBI agents interviewed Flynn in the…

…the codename for Flynn. According to Halper, while he was unsure of the date of the event at which Flynn spoke, he remembered that at the time, Flynn still held…

…Flynn’s role as an informal adviser to President Trump was not well-known: While Lokhova’s complaint alleged that “In late 2015, General Flynn informally became an adviser to the Trump presidential…

…represented the special counsel’s office, “thoroughly prais[ing] Mr. Flynn, telling the court: ‘I’d like to highlight that General Flynn has held nothing back, nothing in his extensive cooperation with the…

…oppose the government’s motion to dismiss the criminal charge against Flynn. Flynn, who had entered into a plea agreement with the special prosecutor’s office for making false statements to FBI…

…that Flynn did not ask Kislyak to do anything — or refrain from doing anything — in response to the sanctions. What Was Flynn’s Call Really About? Instead, what Flynn…

…in the public interest, and in the interest of fairness to Lt. General Flynn.” That suggests the information, at a minimum, was favorable to Flynn, and since in sentencing a…

…the government had thereby breached its obligations to Flynn under his plea agreement. They asserted Flynn had been truthful and accused the prosecutors of wanting Flynn to lie. This dispute…

…Strzok’s interview similarly states that “McCabe called Flynn at 12:30 p.m.” So which was it? Did McCabe call Flynn or Flynn call McCabe? Who initiated the telephone call may seem…

…“lawyers’ understanding” not to prosecute Flynn’s son if the retired lieutenant general pleaded guilty. The criminal case against Flynn began when President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser pleaded guilty…

…McCord, assistant attorney general at the time, said a Logan Act prosecution seemed like a stretch. 5. Flynn’s Prosecution and Guilty Plea Flynn was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. §…

…of alleged communications between Flynn and Alptekin as damaging Flynn, Flynn’s current legal team is unconcerned with Kelner’s testimony, as demonstrated by the fact that it was Flynn’s waiver of…

…Michael Flynn, had discussed with Kislyak Russia’s response to the Obama administration imposition of sanctions for Russia’s attempts to meddle in the 2016 elections. According to news reports, Flynn had…

…treating Flynn any differently, given the information.” The mention of Flynn “and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions,” was in reference to intercepted telephone calls between Flynn and the Russian…

…Flynn, federal prosecutors attempted to force Flynn to testify at Rafiekian’s trial that Flynn had knowingly made false statements in the FARA filings—something Flynn denies. When Flynn refused to lie,…

…with dispatch, the Flynn case lingered until President Trump, on Nov. 25, 2020, issued Flynn a pardon. Thereafter, the government moved to dismiss the case against Flynn as moot based…

…the interest of fairness to Lt. General Flynn.” Evidence “in the interest of fairness to Lt. General Flynn” would qualify as favorable evidence for purposes of sentencing Flynn, and would…

…of making a request related to General Flynn,” Power again claimed. “Okay,” Schiff said. “And I take it you never leaked Mr. Flynn’s name in any way, General Flynn’s name?”…

…no relationship with Flynn, having “met General Flynn on only one occasion at a dinner in Cambridge in February 2014. The dinner was attended by upwards of a dozen people,…

…after U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen conducted an independent review of the Flynn prosecution. Jensen’s investigation uncovered substantial exculpatory evidence that had never been provided to Flynn — evidence indicating Flynn…

…Russian ambassador, the charge Flynn pleaded guilty to. Flynn stated that “in truth and in fact, however, Flynn then and there knew that the following had occurred…” The Statement of…

…said he would “take further steps towards restoring Russia-U.S. relations.” According to the Statement of Offense filed in Flynn’s criminal case, on Dec. 31, Kislyak “called Flynn and informed him…

…and spy on General Flynn.” But according to the IG, the FBI had not yet tasked Halper with investigating any of the targets of Crossfire Hurricane. So, was Halper’s interest…