A North Carolina magistrate thought she lost everything when she was forced to resign from her job due to her religious beliefs. She sued the state over discrimination and a federal judge awarded her $300,000.
There is simply no historical ground upon which Politico can claim that protecting the right of medical professionals not to participate in abortion has been ‘controversial’ since Roe v. Wade.
‘I don’t want to live in an America where nuns have to sue for the right to not pay for birth control because that is a moral concern for them.’
In a recent motion, the Department of Justice told a group of religious leaders to stay out of a dispute involving religious expression.
On America’s birthday, it is appropriate to be thankful and reflect on how we can guard against the suppression of religious freedom, before it is too late.
Three years, one congressman, and a mountain of attorneys later, the National Park Service is doing the right thing for a Christian geologist.
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, the Supreme Court gave the lines between church and state some definition and struck a blow for religious liberty in the process.
East Lansing is so intolerant of Steve Tennes’s religious viewpoint that it is willing to monitor Steve’s Facebook posts and punish Steve for what he says and does outside of East Lansing.
Sen. Bernie Sanders demands an unconstitutional religious litmus test on Christians in public service positions, yet the exact opposite for those of Islamic faith.
During a Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders tried to impose an unconstitutional religious test, calling Christianity ‘hateful.’
While a reprieve from the mandate would be another victory for the Little Sisters, their court battle would continue since subsequent administrations could issue new rules returning the fines.
The attorney who argued this case says the decision ‘reassures us all that, no matter what you believe, the law can’t force you to express a message in conflict with your deepest convictions.’
The religious liberty of people of faith and the rights of LGBT individuals can be protected at the same time. There is no reason protection cannot accommodate all Americans equally.
Donald Trump’s executive order on religious liberty does little, and what little it does can be easily overturned.
The Supreme Court is set to determine whether government can exclude certain nonprofits from neutrally available public benefits solely because they are religious.
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
Trump promised while on the campaign trail that he would defend religious freedom. Now is the time to make good on that promise.
It doesn’t matter which faith you adhere to—we should care about attacks on the Catholic Church, because one threat to religious liberty affects us all.
- How The Code Name ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Undermines The FBI’s Russia StoryThe paper of record has apparently joined a campaign, scontinue reading >
- No, Miss, Taking Off Your Clothes Won’t Create Social JusticeIf ‘respectability politics’ is naively misguided, continue reading >
- Why It’s Ridiculous To Say FBI Spying Meant To Protect The Trump CampaignThe decision to use Stefan Halper as an informant instecontinue reading >