President Joe Biden lies about pretty much everything and his professed lack of knowledge of Hunter Biden’s sketchy foreign business dealings is no exception. Despite mounting evidence that Biden knew of and was involved in his son’s overseas transactions, the corporate media gladly ignored his role in the Biden family business and subdued any evidence suggesting otherwise.
The New York Post reported this week that Hunter’s closest business partner Eric Schwerin made nearly 20 visits to the White House and “other official locations” while Biden was vice president and while Hunter was finagling deals with foreign oligarchs in Russia and China.
Most of the meetings were between Schwerin and Joe and Jill Biden’s aides. One of the meetings included Schwerin, who was president of Hunter’s investment fund Rosemont Seneca Partners, and Biden in the West Wing on Nov. 17, 2010.
These Obama-era White House visitor logs further prove Biden knew that Hunter was using his name and title to seal deals with foreign oligarchs and enrich the Biden family business.
Emails from Hunter’s infamous laptop already signaled that Biden knew about his son’s work and even had relationships with Hunter’s business partners including a Burisma adviser Vadym Pozharskyi.
“Thank you for inviting me to DC and giving me an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together,” Pozharskyi wrote in an email to Hunter in 2015, just a few months before Biden lobbied for the firing of a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.
It wasn’t until a few weeks ago, however, that the corrupt press bothered to start asking about the president’s connections to his son’s deals.
“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden said at a Democrat fundraiser in Iowa in 2019.
He repeated his firm denial just a few months later to Axios’s Mike Allen when he asked about Hunter’s position on the board of a Ukrainian energy company.
“I don’t know what he was doing. I know he was on the board. … I trust my son,” Biden, who was visibly angered by the question, exclaimed.
Allen noted that Biden’s response didn’t “pass the smell test.” His apparent skepticism about the Biden family business, however, obviously didn’t carry water with his outlet or any other corporate media organization when the New York Post reported on Hunter’s laptop less than a year later.
Instead, the corrupt press lied that the laptop was “Russian disinformation” and refused to cover the treasure trove of corruption exposed by emails and documents on the Mac. Big Tech also censored any mention of Hunter’s laptop into oblivion just one month before the November 2020 election. It wasn’t until recently that these same major outlets that refused to cover the bombshell information reported by the New York Post admitted that the laptop is legit.
In that same vein, after Biden said he didn’t know anything about Hunter’s business dealings, NBC News journalist Kristen Welker took Biden’s claim that “My son has not made money in terms of this thing about, talking about China” at face value when moderating the final presidential debate in 2020, and waited another year before she finally asked the White House about the president’s false comments.
“During the last presidential debate, [Joe] Biden was asked if there’s anything inappropriate or unethical about his son’s relationships, business dealings in China and/or Ukraine. The president said ‘nothing was unethical.’ … Does the White House stand by that comment?” she asked last month.
White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield declined to acknowledge Biden’s lie and instead defended the president and his son. She endorsed Biden’s claim that “nothing was unethical” about Hunter’s complicated dealings and that Hunter “has not made money” off of his transactions with a Chinese Communist Party-controlled company despite receipts showing otherwise.
Why did Welker just recently press the Biden administration about an issue that came up two years ago and again less than a month before a key election? She had the opportunity to push back on Biden directly during the debate but she didn’t.
The corporate media is the propaganda arm of the administration, which is why, when Biden dismissed President Donald Trump’s laptop questions during the final debate as Russian disinformation, so did Welker and everyone else in the corrupt media establishment.
There’s plenty of evidence that Biden was involved and may have even profited off of Hunter’s foreign business dealings but the propaganda press refused to ask the right questions at the right time. They were so wrapped up in fixing the narrative to ensure a Biden victory that they failed to do their jobs and now Americans, many of whom said they would have voted differently in 2020 if they knew about Hunter’s laptop and the Biden family corruption, are paying for it.