The question Obergefell has raised across that land is: can we craft laws that permit mutually exclusive views to peacefully coexist? Or must the disfavored view be driven out of public life?
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
Mount Rushmore reminds us how we used to talk as a nation. This is what we used to believe. This is what I want my sons to remember.
The case of Judge Ruth Neely in Wyoming shows, in stark clarity, that it doesn’t actually matter whether religious people do their jobs well and keep their religion to themselves.
- Dana Loesch: Here’s The Real Story Of What Happened At CNN’s Garbage Town HallAs Loesch and her security detail walked toward the stacontinue reading >
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >
- Parkland Officer’s Hesitation To Stop Shooting Fits A Pattern Of Police CowardiceIt’s a lot easier to police good people than bad onescontinue reading >