Yes, the news media hates Donald Trump. No, it isn’t a conspiracy.
One of things we learned from Rod Rosenstein is that there’s still no evidence of ‘collusion.’ But that didn’t stop MSM outlets from finding some anyway.
All of the major players in this story — Ali Watkins, James Wolfe, The New York Times, and the Department of Justice — behaved in less than admirable fashion.
Those who believe the state is better than the market at allocating resources will have the same attitude toward the marketplace of ideas.
In an opinion article posing as a news story, The New York Times launches an illiberal and wrongheaded attack on free speech. At least we know where they stand.
Anti-Trump journalists are using the Annapolis shooting to assert that neither President Trump nor anyone else should criticize them any more.
Leaks to the press about the FBI investigating the Trump campaign’s Russia ties made a huge splash prior to the election.
Known for his conservative values, children’s TV host Fred Rogers is being wildly applauded from surprising corners thanks to a new documentary.
Feminists like Jessica Valenti are attempting to usurp the true definition of feminism via any means possible and write their own rules in the process.
Just because media didn’t properly cover your scandals doesn’t mean you weren’t involved in them.
Articles attempting to debunk the negative experience of abortion continue to be everywhere. Those of us who have experienced the negative consequences find it frustrating and unjust.
There may have been a real White House briefing with real White House officials, but The New York Times couldn’t be trusted to accurately summarize what the White House official said. And it wasn’t on a minor point.
A thorough recounting of false reports in the last century could fill a book. The press should feel fortunate a third of Americans still believe them.
Trump was criticized for referring to members of MS-13 as ‘animals.’ This is a violent gang with the motto ‘kill, rape, control.’
It’s reasonable to assume that much of the new information in the New York Times report relates to leakers’ fears about information that will be coming out in the inspector general report.
It’s strange that a president who transformed national discourse left America with a negligible policy legacy. But Barack Obama deserves it.
It must have been someone else’s concepts the Bolsheviks were touting as they slit the throats of the members of the provisional government in Saint Petersburg.
The New York Times article is riddled with errors that multiple sources publicly deny. It fails to include information easily found in the public record.
- Michael Anton’s Attack On Birthright Citizenship Is A DisgraceThere is no justification for ending birthright citizencontinue reading >
- Poll: Americans Don’t Give A Hoot About So-Called Russian CollusionLess than 1 percent of Americans think Russian collusiocontinue reading >
- ‘White House Should Defend Diplomats,’ Says Hillary Clinton, Who Let U.S. Diplomats DieUnder Hillary Clinton's watch, four Americans -- two dicontinue reading >