McCabe’s actions prove that the Russia probe was always tainted and that many in the FBI and DOJ aren’t public servants, but rather incompetent attention-seekers.
The media has started backing away from the Russia collusion hoax. Many seem to know a reckoning is coming.
The prospect of impeachment proceedings makes many Democrats foam at the mouth, but it might not be as damning for Trump as many expect.
The Department of Justice’s Bruce Ohr claimed he repeatedly said information was not verified, risked bias, and had been obtained under political circumstances.
A Friday expose from the New York Times reveals that the FBI investigation of Trump for alleged treason was little more than retaliation against the president for lawfully firing an incompetent and ethically challenged FBI director.
Late Friday, a federal judge’s office confirmed that several documents that would shed light on the special counsel’s lead prosecutor’s alleged misconduct are missing from the court record.
According to multiple reports, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will resign soon to make room for the incoming Attorney General William Barr, whom Rosenstein helped pick.
After nearly two years since the Steele dossier was published, it remains the cornerstone of the case for collusion. The dossier model has also given rise to similar operations.
For many, the criminal case against Flynn was never about Flynn; it was about our country abandoning the precept of equal justice under the law.
Rod Rosenstein says Barr’s memo didn’t have any influence on Robert Mueller’s probe. It was so sensible, it should have.
It’s increasingly difficult to sustain the smoke without any actual fire, and that reality is now evident in even liberal publications.
The FBI’s conduct with Flynn is a troubling display of the government using its power against a citizen to achieve the effect it desired.
The contrast between the outcome of Andrew McCabe lying to the FBI and Michael Flynn lying to the FBI demonstrates the DoJ is ruled by only one law: Does it help get Trump?
On Monday, former FBI director James Comey returns to the hill for a second round of questioning before the House judiciary and oversight committees.
The sentencing memorandum reveals for the first time concrete evidence that the FBI created multiple summaries of Michael Flynn’s questioning, which may indicate they’re hiding the truth.
If we didn’t need a free and independent media, it would be comical how they all yap this same talking point in perfect harmony.
Shame on The New York Times for printing this unsupported and irresponsible speculation. This kind of journalism is doing real harm to our democracy.
Following Michael Cohen’s surprise guilty plea, the media and critics of the president wasted no time pushing collusion narratives, conspiracy theories, and outright falsehoods.
Like so many other Trump-Russia collusion theories, this is yet another half-built bridge that doesn’t connect to the other shore.
The evidence continues to mount that during the Obama administration, the FBI used George Papadopoulos as a prop to legitimize investigating the Donald Trump campaign.
- Left To State Supreme Court Candidate: You Can’t Be A Good Judge Because You’re A ChristianJudge Brian Hagedorn is being publicly trashed for beincontinue reading >
- Why Do People Hope Hate Crimes Occurred Even When There’s No Evidence?When evidence is lacking, some would rather their own scontinue reading >
- AOC Is Right: Amazon’s Jobs Aren’t Worth $3 Billion In Corporate WelfareDeals like the one struck between Amazon and New York scontinue reading >