The Federalist Radio Hour rounds up the expert legal and sports opinions of Bill James, Ilya Shapiro, and ESPN reporter David Purdum.
The Supreme Court effectively repealed the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller by restricting the amendment to common arms.
On the cases with less political valence the justices can ‘nerd out’ on legal theories and reveal their jurisprudential minds when they know their decisions won’t make the front pages.
On Thursday, a federal district court judge upheld Massachusetts’ ‘assault-weapon’ ban.
SCOTUS reporter Kevin Daley joins the Federalist Radio Hour to talk all the latest court and justice stories including #FreeAdnan, the NIFLA case, and more.
How many Supreme Court justices have to publicly support repeal of the Second Amendment for gun owners to take them seriously without ridicule?
Based on oral arguments, even the liberal justices didn’t like a law that discriminates against pro-life pregnancy clinics.
A powerful amicus brief seeks to bring humanity to a complex legal question about free speech overlaid with the also-controversial issue of abortion.
If stripping unions of the ability to coerce workers is a crippling event, then it’s an event worth celebrating.
“Janus v. AFSME” is a case about restoring workers’ first amendment rights. Dan DiSalvo joins Federalist Radio to discuss the power and money unions hold.
The justices shouldn’t extend law enforcement’s reach beyond our borders. More importantly, Congress needs to update a 30-year-old law for the digital age.
While there is always a risk of reading too much into Supreme Court justices’ questions during oral argument, there is often much to be gleaned.
Except for justices Kagan and Ginzburg, an uneasiness about the case was evident to a greater and lesser degree among the other 7 Supreme Court justices.
If I encountered an individual morally uncomfortable with participating in an activity with me and my boyfriend, it would be uncomfortable for me to force her.
The case involves sports betting in New Jersey, of all things, and it could have ramifications for the regulation of everything from marijuana and guns to immigration and health care.
A recent development challenges the ACLU’s narrative that the Justice Department acted improvidently in filing a petition about a foreign minor who demanded a U.S. abortion.
Should government be able to seize your smartphone and other private digital information without a warrant and use it against you?
The silence of the Supreme Court in denying review in Kolbe v. Hogan signaled the justices’ capitulation to the tyranny of pundits, politicians, and a small but vocal populace.
The Supreme Court has been gun-shy for the past few years, but Silvester v. Becerra may finally help move the courts toward competent Second Amendment decisions.
A long-fought battle to keep the Golden State from forcing its pro-life citizens to choose between obeying conscience or the law of the land is on its way to Washington DC for a final decision.
- How The Code Name ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Undermines The FBI’s Russia StoryThe paper of record has apparently joined a campaign, scontinue reading >
- I’m A Democrat, And The Left’s Russia Gaslighting Scares Me More Than Trump DoesMy fellow Democrats are increasingly becoming the kind continue reading >
- Andrew McCabe Spent $70,000 On A Table. The FBI Hid It From CongressAndrew McCabe, who was fired for lying under oath, spencontinue reading >