SCOTUS is hearing a case today that involves the complex and often-misinterpreted Fourth Amendment: District of Columbia v. Wesby.
The questions Melissa Cook sought to litigate before the Supreme Court involved a case that screamed of the scandal underlying the U.S. surrogacy industry.
Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner said he would sign a bill allowing taxpayer dollars to fund abortions for women enrolled in Medicaid.
Despite this week’s positive religious liberty rulings, the 2015 Obergefell ruling created conflicting precedent harassing schools into controversial manifestations of unproven gender ideology.
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, the Supreme Court gave the lines between church and state some definition and struck a blow for religious liberty in the process.
Our commerce and speech are often inseparably linked, such that the government’s attempt to limit one results in limiting the other.
Will a dispute over tire scraps wind up scrapping anti-Catholic laws in 37 states?
The biggest current winners of a practice nearly as old as the republic are black and Hispanic members of Congress. Do Democrats want to reduce their numbers?
In a unanimous ruling Tuesday that splintered on its reasoning, the high court correctly held that the “disparagement clause” of federal trademark law violated the Constitution.
If our system of government devolves into a political tug-of-war between the executive branch and the judiciary, we all lose.
This week, in an echo of the 21 contenders for the Supreme Court rolled out during the campaign, 11 would-be black-robers join last month’s stellar list of 10 lower-court nominees.
A look at history will show how the Supreme Court’s liberal justices abandoned their principles in pursuit of a purely political win for Democrats.
A recent controversy over cultural insensitivity at the Whitney Museum in New York betrays the Left’s basic incapacity to process conflict and confusion over the rule of law.
Trinity Lutheran Church is only asking to be treated the same as everyone else. That shouldn’t be too much to ask.
The Supreme Court is set to determine whether government can exclude certain nonprofits from neutrally available public benefits solely because they are religious.
ADF Legal Counsel, Kerri Kupec, joins this episode of Federalist Radio to break down some of the most important current First Amendment legal cases.
How increasingly letting states and citizens sue to stop laws and regulations they don’t like, such as President Trump’s immigration order, can politicize courts and end self-government.
Our discourse is full of rhetorical terms used to frighten or cajole the public in a given direction. But these words don’t mean what you think they mean.
- 25 Things Men Can Do To Support Women Without Becoming WomenThe women of The Federalist have compiled a list of waycontinue reading >
- I Don’t Care If It’s Halloween. Your Gruesome And Tacky Yard Decorations Are Sick And RudeNothing will make me like your blow-up witch or hauntedcontinue reading >
- No, Saving A Child Instead Of Embryos In A Burning Building Does Not Negate The Pro-Life PositionA recent highly viral tweetstorm by author Patrick Tomlcontinue reading >