If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
The case of Judge Ruth Neely in Wyoming shows, in stark clarity, that it doesn’t actually matter whether religious people do their jobs well and keep their religion to themselves.
- Here’s What Ronald Reagan Did When College Kids Went Ape At UC-BerkeleyAs governor of California, Ronald Reagan had to deal wicontinue reading >
- Sorry, College Kids, There’s No Such Thing As Hate SpeechProgressive college students seem to think violence is continue reading >
- The ‘March For Science’ Shows How Carl Sagan Ruined ScienceThe organizers of the 'March for Science' follow the lecontinue reading >