The question Obergefell has raised across that land is: can we craft laws that permit mutually exclusive views to peacefully coexist? Or must the disfavored view be driven out of public life?
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
The case of Judge Ruth Neely in Wyoming shows, in stark clarity, that it doesn’t actually matter whether religious people do their jobs well and keep their religion to themselves.
- Can We Be Honest About Women?Here’s a little secret we have to say out loud: Womencontinue reading >
- 8 Worst Defenses Of FBI Agent’s Anti-Trump ‘Insurance Policy’ TextsHow do the media handle dramatic updates that counter tcontinue reading >
- Why Criminalizing Sexual Harassment Fosters Witch HuntsSexual harassment digests a degenerate thug like Harveycontinue reading >