If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
The case of Judge Ruth Neely in Wyoming shows, in stark clarity, that it doesn’t actually matter whether religious people do their jobs well and keep their religion to themselves.
- The Media Spreads Fake News About Ivanka TrumpJournalists, pundits, and activists rewrite the facts ocontinue reading >
- Refusing To Allow Neutrality On Trump Will Not End WellWhen we’re sternly admonished that you’re for Trumpcontinue reading >
- Why I Refuse To Attend My 20th Yale ReunionIt is time to show the oleaginous technocrats running tcontinue reading >