Chelsea Clinton claimed that Roe v. Wade helped add $3.5 trillion to the economy. It’s taken away far more.
Law – especially constitutional law – shouldn’t be made on the basis of policy preferences. Abortion is no exception.
Ilyse Hogue recently claimed President Trump ‘is going to put someone on the court who will be the fifth vote to criminalize abortion, punish women and throw them in jail.’
It’s not especially her political apostasy that’s the problem. It’s weakness of her arguments.
Should Roe v. Wade be overturned, the question of abortion would return to the states, in most cases the legislative branch.
Winning elections means nothing if you cannot or will not do the right thing while in office. The whole point of winning is to use your power to do the right thing.
Can answers to a poll question like ‘Do you support Roe v. Wade?’ demonstrate that the public supports the abortion policy Roe requires? Not at all.
Progressive writer Rachel Held Evans claimed if pro-lifers knew that babies saved from outlawing abortion were black, we would probably be pro-choice.
The overwhelming repeal of Ireland’s constitutional prohibition on abortion is a reminder that without Christianity, liberalism descends into brutality.
When Roe v. Wade is finally overturned, the matter will be left to the states. Some states will ban the practice, and more will follow suit.
The First Amendment includes the right not to speak, but the California law takes that right away by forcing pro-lifers to tell women about abortion centers.
The event is the largest annual human rights demonstration in the history of the world, and brings in pro-life marchers from across the United States.
These moms rejected abortion, chose life in an unexpected pregnancy, and stood with President Trump during his address to the March for Life.
‘Are all men created equal, or are some more equal than others?’
There is simply no historical ground upon which Politico can claim that protecting the right of medical professionals not to participate in abortion has been ‘controversial’ since Roe v. Wade.
Abortion providers in Texas don’t think the state should require them to kill a fetus before dismembering it in its mother’s womb.
If the Supreme Court overturns Roe, abortion law will merely revert to the constitutionally charged lawmakers: those elected by the people to serve in the legislative branch.
J.D. is an unaccompanied minor who illegally entered the United States in September seeking an abortion and is now the focus of the federal court system and national media.
At issue is whether the United States will expand its mission to ending the lives of preborn infants for all those who travel here illegally.
Roe v. Wade came at the tail end of millennia of ignorance about human development. Before ultrasound technology, developing life in the womb was a black box. No more.
- CNN Just Sued The Government To Get The Names And Addresses Of Manafort JurorsThe anti-Trump cable network has a history of doxxing tcontinue reading >
- These Screenshots Show How Google Shadowbans Conservative And Pro-Trump ContentNew membership on my Facebook page has stopped dead. Mycontinue reading >
- Identity Politics Are Rapidly Destroying The Value Of College DegreesToo often, college is merely a signal to show bare minicontinue reading >