In 1992, the Supreme Court staked its abortion doctrine on the notion that women require abortion to vie for equal opportunity. That has been proven wrong time and time again.
Should Roe v. Wade be overturned, the question of abortion would return to the states, in most cases the legislative branch.
Can answers to a poll question like ‘Do you support Roe v. Wade?’ demonstrate that the public supports the abortion policy Roe requires? Not at all.
Abortion providers in Texas don’t think the state should require them to kill a fetus before dismembering it in its mother’s womb.
Should pro-lifers who voted for the president because he promised to nominate a judge who would overturn Roe worry it won’t happen?
The real sham against women is the Supreme Court’s false promises of protection. Clearly, shoddy, substandard, and incompetent abortionists provide mere ‘access’ to abortion.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion ripping apart the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down Texas laws requiring health standards for abortion.
Planned Parenthood’s research arm is hiding data to bolster claims that Planned Parenthood and IUDs are reducing unintended births among poor women.
You will never believe the horrors Pennsylvanian women endured before lawmakers required abortion facilities to comply with basic medical standards.
The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would ban abortions after 20 weeks gestation. And it’s probably consonant with Roe v. Wade.
- Here’s The Plot For The Next ‘Roseanne’ Reboot America NeedsOne fan had an idea: James Woods and Roseanne Barr teamcontinue reading >
- NYT: Jeff Sessions Is Doing A Great Job Fighting DOJ’s Liberal BureaucracyIntending to paint Jeff Sessions negatively, the Times continue reading >
- How Political Correctness Has Ruined Disney’s Most Recent Princess MoviesInstead of telling stories and developing compelling chcontinue reading >