The question Obergefell has raised across that land is: can we craft laws that permit mutually exclusive views to peacefully coexist? Or must the disfavored view be driven out of public life?
Despite this week’s positive religious liberty rulings, the 2015 Obergefell ruling created conflicting precedent harassing schools into controversial manifestations of unproven gender ideology.
Our culture is obsessed with granting validation and approval through naming each sexual phenomena. So we’ll keep making up new terms for sexual preference.
The ever-changing interpretation of the Constitution Senate Democrats promote imposes litmus tests nearly every justice who is not currently serving would fail.
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
In the first two days of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings, senators pressed nominee Neil Gorsuch on a variety of issues that may be before the court, from antitrust to campaign finance.
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
Their mutual love of flowers brought them together, but Baronnelle Stutzman and Robert Ingersoll’s love for each other grew out of their love of growing things.
The Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled that for newborn children of lesbian married couples, only the biological mother should be listed on the original birth certificate.
InterVarsity is suddenly a target. Yet many other organizations hold similar ethical stances, and even more forcefully, and are not being protested. So what’s this about?
Federalist senior editor Mollie Hemingway joined several others for a discussion about religious liberty and marriage at CPAC on Thursday.
Each side of same-sex politics is trying to comfortably fit into the legal shoe their opponent was wearing last year.
Pope Francis’s visit with the protesting Kentucky clerk highlights Kim Davis’s appeal to a higher law than ones the Supreme Court can adjudicate.
For the sake of the liberal morality narrative, Kim Davis has to go down. To sell that to the public, she must be dismissed as a right-wing crank.
Kim Davis may be taking her religious liberty too far. But she’s right that Obergefell is unjust.
Kim Davis’s relative insignificance is exactly why she must be so thoroughly eviscerated.
Marriage deserves special attention from government — and its redefinition does not.
- Your Refusal To Date Conservatives Is One Reason We Have Donald TrumpOkCupid will let users indicate their support for abortcontinue reading >
- After My Husband’s Death, I’m Learning To Steward The Light He Left Behind'All of us who knew him and loved him are keepers of thcontinue reading >
- At The Emmys, Dolly Parton’s Reaction To Trump-Bashing Was All Of UsAt the 69th annual Emmy awards, Dolly Parton looked precontinue reading >