The question Obergefell has raised across that land is: can we craft laws that permit mutually exclusive views to peacefully coexist? Or must the disfavored view be driven out of public life?
Despite this week’s positive religious liberty rulings, the 2015 Obergefell ruling created conflicting precedent harassing schools into controversial manifestations of unproven gender ideology.
Our culture is obsessed with granting validation and approval through naming each sexual phenomena. So we’ll keep making up new terms for sexual preference.
The ever-changing interpretation of the Constitution Senate Democrats promote imposes litmus tests nearly every justice who is not currently serving would fail.
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
In the first two days of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings, senators pressed nominee Neil Gorsuch on a variety of issues that may be before the court, from antitrust to campaign finance.
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
Their mutual love of flowers brought them together, but Baronnelle Stutzman and Robert Ingersoll’s love for each other grew out of their love of growing things.
The Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled that for newborn children of lesbian married couples, only the biological mother should be listed on the original birth certificate.
InterVarsity is suddenly a target. Yet many other organizations hold similar ethical stances, and even more forcefully, and are not being protested. So what’s this about?
Federalist senior editor Mollie Hemingway joined several others for a discussion about religious liberty and marriage at CPAC on Thursday.
Each side of same-sex politics is trying to comfortably fit into the legal shoe their opponent was wearing last year.
Pope Francis’s visit with the protesting Kentucky clerk highlights Kim Davis’s appeal to a higher law than ones the Supreme Court can adjudicate.
For the sake of the liberal morality narrative, Kim Davis has to go down. To sell that to the public, she must be dismissed as a right-wing crank.
Kim Davis may be taking her religious liberty too far. But she’s right that Obergefell is unjust.
Kim Davis’s relative insignificance is exactly why she must be so thoroughly eviscerated.
- Victor Davis Hanson On The Fate Of The West, Trump, And The ResistanceBen Weingarten interviews writer and scholar Victor Davcontinue reading >
- What Ultimately Took Kate Spade And Anthony Bourdain Wasn’t Mental Illness. It Was Something WorseLet us be intellectually honest about the sorrows of thcontinue reading >
- TIME Stands By Erroneous Crying Girl Cover Story Because Of Its Propaganda Value'The June 12 photograph of the 2-year-old Honduran girlcontinue reading >