The question Obergefell has raised across that land is: can we craft laws that permit mutually exclusive views to peacefully coexist? Or must the disfavored view be driven out of public life?
Despite this week’s positive religious liberty rulings, the 2015 Obergefell ruling created conflicting precedent harassing schools into controversial manifestations of unproven gender ideology.
It is one thing to compassionately treat those with gender dysphoria. It is another thing entirely to cause gender dysphoria.
Our culture is obsessed with granting validation and approval through naming each sexual phenomena. So we’ll keep making up new terms for sexual preference.
The assumption in Obergefell that the sexes are interchangeable is affecting laws and regulations that concern sex differences in many other forms.
The ever-changing interpretation of the Constitution Senate Democrats promote imposes litmus tests nearly every justice who is not currently serving would fail.
If the Wyoming Supreme Court is permitted to insert an unstated requirement upon judges, what prevents some future court from reading pastors, priests, and bishops into the same decision?
The 3-2 decision of the Wyoming Supreme Court says holding mainstream Christian beliefs undermines Judge Ruth Neely’s impartiality even though marriages aren’t part of her duties.
Obama-era rules empower meat inspectors to become speech inspectors, and that’s created a crazy situation at one farm in Michigan.
The Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled that for newborn children of lesbian married couples, only the biological mother should be listed on the original birth certificate.
Rather than accepting the Supreme Court’s usurpations as ‘law of the land,’ Republicans should restore the court’s coequal status with Congress and the presidency.
Each side of same-sex politics is trying to comfortably fit into the legal shoe their opponent was wearing last year.
Pope Francis’s visit with the protesting Kentucky clerk highlights Kim Davis’s appeal to a higher law than ones the Supreme Court can adjudicate.
For the sake of the liberal morality narrative, Kim Davis has to go down. To sell that to the public, she must be dismissed as a right-wing crank.
Kim Davis may be taking her religious liberty too far. But she’s right that Obergefell is unjust.
Ted Cruz and even Kim Davis have a point when they say the Supreme Court as an institution needs to be challenged.
Kim Davis’s relative insignificance is exactly why she must be so thoroughly eviscerated.
Governor Kasich gained favor among Republicans after the first debate, but his record on gay marriage should give conservatives some serious pause.
- Donald Trump Needs To Not Be President YesterdayWe're done with the 'take what we can get' phase of Doncontinue reading >
- The ‘Peanuts’ Football Trick Explains Why Conservatives Keep Quiet About White SupremacyIt shouldn’t come as a surprise when those who are incontinue reading >
- If We’re Tearing Down White Supremacy, Start With Planned ParenthoodIf you were a white supremacist who wanted to sharply rcontinue reading >