President Trump understands the most direct path to change is to work in people’s self-interest, to cater to advancement through mutual gain — a strategy that also won him the election.
Will Wilkinson at Vox insists there are no reasonable arguments to be made that radical Islam poses any threat to the United States or Western civilization.
Political Islam implies a constitutional order fundamentally incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and the ‘constitution of liberty’ that is the foundation of the American way of life.
“Not a terrorist” cannot be our standard for potential immigrants. We need to talk about the mores, customs, and beliefs that characterize migrant groups.
Perhaps we should think of Islamophobia as fearing to speak up about potential threats and abuses inside Islam. ‘Clock boy’ Ahmed Mohamed’s lawsuit would have reinforced that fear.
‘Jerusalem 1000 to 1400: Every People Under Heaven’ at the Metropolitan Museum of Art is a sophisticated exercise in historical revision and cultural proselytizing.
A new World Bank study debunks the progressive theory that ISIS recruits are motivated by economics or education, rather than religious belief.
Until we can name the enemy that terrorizes us and the world, we will never defeat them.
As militant Islam becomes more prominent in world affairs, it becomes less prominent in American classrooms.
A rise in terrorist attacks is further evidence that the global appeal of ISIS-inspired jihad is not dwindling.
In al-Qaeda’s response to media coverage of the Orlando attack, life imitates satire.
If we continue to characterize these mass killings as events disassociated from Islamic doctrine and faith, we will fail to identify and thus defeat our enemy.
Over the last 15 years, we’ve witnessed two U.S. administrations evade the responsibility of understanding the Islamic totalitarian movement, and fail to defeat it.
These ‘Muslims’ excoriate the decadence of the West in between bong hits while watching porn, listening to hip-hop, and playing video games on the Devil’s Box known as ‘a computer.’
Moderate Muslims must explain the substantive difference between Islam and Islamism. If they don’t, the rest of us will worry substantive differences don’t exist.
On Thursday night, the New York Times published a stunning admission from President Obama. By Friday morning, the entire passage was gone from the story.
If ISIS is going to be defeated, Muslims themselves must do it.
In response to the Garland attack, if you really believe in free speech, don’t follow that with “but.”
The Islamic State is difficult to comprehend only for secularists who believe religion is an aberration in the modern world. Actually, they are.
Islamists’ goals are incompatible with our civilization’s survival. Therefore, we must defeat radical Islamism decisively.
- Staying Fit For Your Husband Is One Of The Best Gifts You Can Give HimLiving in a post-feminist culture has made women both ucontinue reading >
- The FBI’s Briefing On The GOP Baseball Shooting Couldn’t Have Been More BizarreThe FBI tried to claim that the shooting at the basebalcontinue reading >
- The GOP Senate Health Care Bill Isn’t Great, But It’s Better Than ObamacareThe GOP has a chance to begin reforming health care by continue reading >