Parents expose their children to great danger by involving them in the crime of illegal U.S. entry. But doing so helps them gain entry. The Department of Justice should handle that humanely.
Many aspects of the refugee resettlement program force states and local governments to continue to accept refugees even if they choose not to participate.
Maybe Congress doesn’t want to fund Trump’s wall because it would never work, not even if the U.S. military built it and deployed along the southern border.
The only interest Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have in these so-called DREAMers is to use them as pawns in a larger game of identity politics.
The American people are losing patience and demanding our government to do something with our broken immigration system.
Our parents respected America enough to not come here illegally, even if it meant being imprisoned, tortured, or even executed while they awaited legal entry.
President Trump has proposed a major immigration plan that includes a path to citizenship for nearly two million protected illegal immigrants and $25 billion for a border wall.
While Democrats play politics, too many Republicans are either too willing to give Democrats what they want while receiving little in return, or secretly have no problem with porous borders.
The EB-5 visa program allows wealthy citizens of foreign countries to effectively buy citizenship, with little vetting.
What if Democrats are using DACA recipients as human shields to get increased voter intensity, political donations, and turnout in upcoming elections?
I question the seriousness of the person who made a media circus out of a comment from a meeting intended for negotiation. We deserve better immigration policy, not more cable news fodder.
But there’s an easy solution to the problem. Congress should authorize the attorney general to impose reasonable conditions on the grant awards in question.
Progressives are predictably hysterical over the Trump administration’s decision to end an immigration program benefitting Salvadorans, but of course the reality is a bit complex. Let’s unpack what’s really going on here.
President Trump, who some suggest is mentally unfit, led the most substantial and important debate on immigration we have seen in a generation.
‘Refugees are welcome’ is a completely safe political statement for people in my uncle’s ritzy neighborhood to make, because they know it isn’t something they’ll ever have to deal with.
While many are calling this a sign of American isolationism, administration officials maintain the real problem is that the compact threatens U.S. sovereignty.
Although the order is more carefully crafted following months of review, Trump’s opponents will still fight it. But that doesn’t mean it will work.
Group identity, open borders, and sanctuary cities are ‘pro-immigrant’ only in the world of fantasy moral high ground.
DACA is not a path to legal residency or U.S. citizenship. It’s only a temporary solution. It’s no different than putting a small Band-Aid on a large wound.
Immigration laws serve the moral purpose of regulating entry into the nation and safeguarding against unwanted or dangerous intruders.
- BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Briefing Details With CNNNew e-mails show that FBI brass discussed details aboutcontinue reading >
- The Left And The Right Aren’t Hearing The Same Jordan PetersonA New York Times Magazine hit piece says more about thecontinue reading >
- Did The Obama Administration Spy On Trump Using Flimsy Evidence? Let’s Find OutIf the Justice Department is as incorruptible as its decontinue reading >