This interplay among the base of new insureds, the spending and tax baselines, and the beliefs of the conservative base will define the House Republican alternative to Obamacare.
Going down the same failed Obamacare approach of more taxes and more spending will not lower health costs. And lower costs is what Republicans should prioritize.
This morning, the Department of Health and Human Services released a rule proposing several changes to Obamacare insurance offerings.
Universal health care could happen for every American in any number of ways that do not involve universal health insurance and all of the problems that it entails.
With health care already consuming nearly one-fifth of our economy and our national debt approaching $20 trillion, does the solution really lie in incentivizing health care spending?
Why is conventional opinion so quick to assume that the American people lack the imagination and initiative to get creative if insurance schemes get scrambled overnight?
To succeed in their attempts to repeal and replace Obamacare—and avoid a midterm drubbing—Republicans must correct the terms of the debate, soon and without wonkiness.
I’m paying for an insurance plan that doesn’t cover the doctors I need to see—and I end up paying for most costs out of pocket anyway. And there’s no way out.
Apparently Harry Reid forgot to heed Hillary Clinton’s warning about fake news, because the idea that thousands of people die from lack of health insurance is preposterous.
There are many reasons conservatives should not remain fixated on the number of people with health insurance when designing an Obamacare alternative.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the media has thus far viewed the debate on an Obamacare replacement entirely through one liberal policy frame: How many people have health insurance cards.
There is a little-noticed flaw in seeking to vindicate Obamacare by focusing on those with pre-existing conditions. It’s called ‘health insurance does not equal health care.’
If the Obamacare exchange plans are so good, why haven’t liberal elites purchased one?
My 96-percent increase in premiums is a useful, unvarnished look at Obamacare’s effects.
After the election, the Republicans will have a chance to effectively finish off Obamacare. They should take it.
To say that Congress should have to write bailout checks to insurers as a result of President Obama’s lawbreaking quite literally adds injury to insult.
Whether government runs all of health care is less material than whether government pays for all of health care. The latter will lead to the former.
Here are three reasons Republicans should not help Democrats ‘fix’ their abomination of a law, but instead replace it with a sensible one that depends on human initiative.
Sound bites often prevent an honest dialogue about the causes of high drug prices and the consequences of government intervention.
- Milo Is A Rorschach Blot About Whom The Reaction Reveals AllThe reaction to Milo Yiannopoulos is riddled with the hcontinue reading >
- Dear Congress: Please Take My ObamaCare Coverage, Because It’s HorribleSome Obamacare enrollees worry about losing their healtcontinue reading >
- Here Are The Media Hottakes We’d See If The Chronicles Of Narnia Were Released This YearHere's how our politically obsessed and ideologically scontinue reading >