President Trump is betraying his promise to protect our Second Amendment rights (and for no meaningful public safety benefit).
Knowing that Americans do not want to give up their right to keep and bear arms, many gun control supporters peddle a soothing lie wrapped in panic.
‘I do not believe like weapons of mass destruction like the AR-15 belong in civilian hands.’
The ballot box, not the Supreme Court, is where the fight for the right to keep and bear arms will be won or lost.
With Justice Brett Kavanaugh, American gun owners know that a majority of Supreme Court justices now support the Heller interpretation of the right to keep and bear arms.
Conservatives and libertarians should take note of this new strategy that could be used to restrict gun rights under the guise of safety.
His record shows Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh supports ‘common sense gun control,’ while the Left remains out of the mainstream.
It is far more common for Americans to use guns to defend themselves or others against violence than to use guns to commit violence. Do those lives matter?
If you set out to write a parody of gun control, it might look like the real news from London, where guns don’t kill people, knives do.
On Thursday, a federal district court judge upheld Massachusetts’ ‘assault-weapon’ ban.
Many Americans think our permissive gun laws beget carnage. The question this faction seems unable to answer is how any good person could disagree.
Gun control advocates rarely state their views so bluntly, but they think Second Amendment rights should be sacrificed solely to assuage their fears.
How many Supreme Court justices have to publicly support repeal of the Second Amendment for gun owners to take them seriously without ridicule?
Every school shooting has two factors in common: guns and a violent person. So, let’s pretend we can get rid of one and see how the other works on its own.
If you ban all abortion, then nobody is legally killed by abortion. If you ban all guns, it doesn’t mean no one is legally killed by guns (since that has never been legal).
The silence of the Supreme Court in denying review in Kolbe v. Hogan signaled the justices’ capitulation to the tyranny of pundits, politicians, and a small but vocal populace.
When the Supreme Court meets today to discuss pending petitions for review, the justices’ conference calendar will include a pivotal Second Amendment case.
Generally, if one is seeking a legislative change, one tends to have an idea of what that change would actually be. Not U.S. gun controllers.
Had gun controllers’ proposed rules been in place, they would not have prevented America’s recent high-profile mass shootings.
- DOJ Destroyed Missing Strzok/Page Text Messages Before The IG Could Review ThemThe DOJ wiped text messages between former FBI employeecontinue reading >
- The Federal Judge Overseeing Michael Flynn’s Sentencing Just Dropped A Major BombshellThe sentencing memorandum reveals for the first time cocontinue reading >
- Top 10 Reasons You Should Own An AR-15Second to the muskets used in our revolutionary and civcontinue reading >