If you set out to write a parody of gun control, it might look like the real news from London, where guns don’t kill people, knives do.
On Thursday, a federal district court judge upheld Massachusetts’ ‘assault-weapon’ ban.
Many Americans think our permissive gun laws beget carnage. The question this faction seems unable to answer is how any good person could disagree.
Gun control advocates rarely state their views so bluntly, but they think Second Amendment rights should be sacrificed solely to assuage their fears.
How many Supreme Court justices have to publicly support repeal of the Second Amendment for gun owners to take them seriously without ridicule?
Every school shooting has two factors in common: guns and a violent person. So, let’s pretend we can get rid of one and see how the other works on its own.
If you ban all abortion, then nobody is legally killed by abortion. If you ban all guns, it doesn’t mean no one is legally killed by guns (since that has never been legal).
The silence of the Supreme Court in denying review in Kolbe v. Hogan signaled the justices’ capitulation to the tyranny of pundits, politicians, and a small but vocal populace.
When the Supreme Court meets today to discuss pending petitions for review, the justices’ conference calendar will include a pivotal Second Amendment case.
Generally, if one is seeking a legislative change, one tends to have an idea of what that change would actually be. Not U.S. gun controllers.
Had gun controllers’ proposed rules been in place, they would not have prevented America’s recent high-profile mass shootings.
For the average American alive today the odds of being murdered have never been lower — even though Americans possess millions more firearms.
Democrats are pushing legislation to create a secret anti-gun list run by bureaucrats whose job has nothing to do with looking out for your interests.
These are the weapon of choice for serial killers, kidnappers, and racists. The torment must end.
Democrats’ gun sales ban bill gives the U.S. attorney general the discretion to decide whether a person meeting the terrorist watch list criteria should be prevented from purchasing a firearm.
If the anti-gun crowd is going to be honest about its intentions, then it should at least be honest about the devastation its agenda would wreak upon the country.
The Nobel-winning president that the world once loved dropped bombs on his own authority in a hyped gun violence speech last night that mostly highlighted his lame-duck status.
It’s practically impossible to make a gun ban work, and it wouldn’t do much to reduce violence.
What should cause more concern: something that happens at an alarming frequency among a small population or something that happens infrequently among a massive population?
- Comey’s Memos Indicate Dossier Briefing Of Trump Was A SetupNew memos suggest Comey briefing of Trump was a setup tcontinue reading >
- Poor Andrew Cuomo Struggles With Life Of Zero Intersectionality Points'As a New Yorker, I am a Muslim. As a New Yorker, I am continue reading >
- Hey, Joe Scarborough, Must You Politicize Every Tragedy?Being skeptical about your government does not make youcontinue reading >