While there is always a risk of reading too much into Supreme Court justices’ questions during oral argument, there is often much to be gleaned.
Not only is there no constitutional warrant for securing ‘dignity,’ but the equal protection of such a right is impossible. Relying on government to ensure it results in state-imposed orthodoxy.
Except for justices Kagan and Ginzburg, an uneasiness about the case was evident to a greater and lesser degree among the other 7 Supreme Court justices.
Cake artist Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop delivered the following statement during a news conference Tuesday.
The ACLU characterizes the core issue in Masterpiece as not free speech or the free exercise of religion, but discrimination comparable to racial division in the 1960s.
Since 1954, the Johnson Amendment has prohibited religious leaders from supporting or opposing political candidates. The GOP tax bill might change that.
Several aspects of Metro’s policy against religious ads and its implementation leave it ripe for defeat solely on free speech grounds.
A long-fought battle to keep the Golden State from forcing its pro-life citizens to choose between obeying conscience or the law of the land is on its way to Washington DC for a final decision.
What good can possibly come from allowing the presentation, no matter how civil, of views so many deem offensive or unpopular? This former Westboro Baptist member knows.
Emily Ekins, director of polling at the Cato Institute, discusses the many surprising results from her major study on free speech, on Federalist Radio.
University philosophy departments are supposed to be centers of open inquiry and rigorous analysis. What happens when that comes up against political correctness?
Countries that experience trauma of this magnitude typically struggle to develop prosperous economies and stable politics. Rwanda is an exception, but not out of the woods yet.
Although not on a scale similar to the Bolshevik revolution, the premises conveyed by Leon Trotsky have replayed themselves in American society.
After Edith Macias ripped the hat off a fellow student’s head, she brought it to the student life offices, expecting its owner to be punished.
The president of Texas Southern University invited Black Lives Matter protesters to disrupt an event with a Republican lawmaker.
It’s never appropriate for a person sworn to defend the Constitution to threaten to shut down political speech. This goes for Donald Trump — and every other politician.
Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s tweet, and the love-fest that followed, encapsulates everything that’s wrong with these protests. No one has the ‘right’ to protest on his or her company’s time.
One might wonder why Jeff Sessions would take the time to say such obvious things, but to judge by the reactions it appears many Americans do indeed need a free speech 101 class.
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >
- Is A Former Feinstein Staffer Running Fusion GPS’s Post-Election Steele Dossier Operation?A former FBI agent who served as one of Sen. Dianne Feicontinue reading >
- On Russia, Democrats Try To Rewrite HistoryThere is a strong case to be made that in nearly every continue reading >