Now that Donald Trump is issuing executive orders that progressives hate, blue states are rediscovering federalism. We should let them do as they please.
After the election, there were reports of EPA employees breaking down in tears and Energy Department staffers needing counseling. It’s not because they care about the environment.
In Alaska’s interior, where it can reach -50 degrees Fahrenheit in winter, the EPA wants people to stop burning wood. But it’s just about their only feasible way to stay warm.
Correctly acknowledging the climate change debate is enough to get EPA nominee Scott Pruitt branded a ‘denialist.’ Why would anyone take such a clownish ideology seriously?
Democrats are about to learn that a legacy built on edicts is easily discarded. That’s good news for the republic.
The Environmental Protection Agency is making it harder for the Navajo to run energy plants that produce jobs and cheap, reliable energy. Next, we’re all paying a third more for energy.
The Supreme Court has paused the EPA’s attempt at taking over the nation’s power plants. Congress should take note.
The Supreme Court says the Clean Water Act is not a grant of federal control over every stream and depression in the nation. The Environmental Protection Agency says otherwise.
During his tenure in Washington, the former Iowa governor has made sure that the wasteful ethanol and biofuels sector remains addicted to taxpayers’ money.
If the Environmental Protection Agency can claim the federal government can regulate manmade ditches and standing water, what private lands will be left?
The EPA has a problem, and it’s not just that mustard yellow river in Colorado.
The Clean Power Plan President Obama released Monday will drastically increase electricity and energy prices, hurting low-income Americans the most.
If the Supreme Court ‘cannot interpret federal statutes to negate their own stated purposes,’ the EPA will face an uphill attempt to nationalize the American electric grid.
The Environmental Protection Agency is messing with Texas’s energy, which in turn will mess with everyone’s.
We don’t have to wreck our economy to save the planet.
President Obama’s 79,066 pages of regulation gave Americans higher energy bills, more expensive consumer goods, and fewer employment opportunities.
President Obama’s little-noticed greenhouse-gas emissions agreement with China may be the most one-sided deal since the Dutch purchased Manhattan.
Eco-worriers failed their midterms, but promise to ace the 2016 finals. Can they?
Why is it even necessary to explain that we don’t need a ‘national food policy’?
If Florida eliminated its carbon dioxide emissions, it would make no difference to global temperatures. Tell that to billionaire Tom Steyer’s attack team.
- Why Is Transgender An Identity But Anorexia A Disorder?Normalizing gender dysphoria pushes other mentally ill continue reading >
- Here Are The Media Hottakes We’d See If The Chronicles Of Narnia Were Released This YearHere's how our politically obsessed and ideologically scontinue reading >
- If You Want Israeli-Palestinian Peace, Stop Talking About A ‘Two-State Solution’Before you get a two-state solution, both people have tcontinue reading >