Overstating the impact of Russia’s influence on the 2016 election is not only dishonest, it helps Vladimir Putin achieve his meddling goals.
There’s a big difference between the two.
Contrary to the mainstream media’s narrative, Robert Mueller’s latest indictment does not implicate President Trump, but exonerate him.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and others embarrassed by DOJ’s actions are shielded by the never-ending nature of the investigation.
Dodging the question doesn’t make it go away: Did Hillary Clinton, dozens of Democratic Party officials, and hundreds of liberal mega-donors break the law?
‘Oh my g-d,’ one man says in audio of the moment the news broke inside a Democratic National Committee meeting. A woman can be heard moaning in the background.
The DNC has laid itself bare to a potentially disastrous discovery process that could expose the Russia-hacking and collusion stories as carefully orchestrated falsehoods.
The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.
The Democratic National Committee just filed a civil suit in the Southern District of New York against the Russian government, members of the Trump campaign, and WikiLeaks.
More big details will likely come from twin U.S. libel lawsuits on a Democrat-funded opposition research dossier from a former British spy used to authorize spying on a U.S. citizen.
Congress requires the FISA court to maintain a pool of lawyers friendly to civil liberties who are willing to challenge the Justice Department’s applications for a spy warrant. But the court almost never uses them.
‘I’ve been watching the Clintons work for 30 years. That’s all the evidence I need,’ my dad told me months ago about the Russia story. The evidence is increasingly proving him right.
Democrats and media are trying to deflect from the House memo by saying the Russia investigation really started in July 2016. That argument doesn’t work in their favor.
Her campaign is linked to at least three separate pieces of information fed to the FBI, including the dossier the FBI used as a pretext to spy on a Trump campaign associate.
The memo asserts the FBI and DOJ scrubbed the Steele dossier of relevant political context when presenting it to the FISA court as a basis for a surveillance warrant.
There’s a lot of misinformation swirling about that shoddy dossier on Trump and Russia compiled by Christopher Steele. Here’s what’s actually been reported on the matter.
It’s easy to blame Sean Hannity for the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. But isn’t this kind of conspiratorial thinking a fixture of our popular culture?
For all their sources, attention to detail, and attempts at even-handedness, the authors of ‘Shattered’ exhibit precisely the media bias that helped deliver President Trump.
It is clear that the Democratic Party has to choose whether it will be open to abortion limits, but it is not clear which choice will ultimately help them compete politically.
Barack Obama is back, but if Democrats ever want to be competitive in national politics, they should hope and pray that he stays out of the spotlight.
- At Helsinki, Trump Undermined Our Power-Abusing Intelligence Agencies, Not AmericaThere’s a big difference between the two.continue reading >
- Poll: Americans Don’t Give A Hoot About So-Called Russian CollusionLess than 1 percent of Americans think Russian collusiocontinue reading >
- Confirmed: DOJ Used Materially False Information To Secure Wiretaps On Trump AssociateNewly released documents confirm House and Senate invescontinue reading >