HuffPost political reporter Igor Bobic joins the Federalist Radio Hour to discuss the ever-changing relationship between President Trump and Congress.
For Democrats, anything the Republicans do is ‘undemocratic.’
The EB-5 visa program allows wealthy citizens of foreign countries to effectively buy citizenship, with little vetting.
What if Democrats are using DACA recipients as human shields to get increased voter intensity, political donations, and turnout in upcoming elections?
Progressives are predictably hysterical over the Trump administration’s decision to end an immigration program benefitting Salvadorans, but of course the reality is a bit complex. Let’s unpack what’s really going on here.
President Trump, who some suggest is mentally unfit, led the most substantial and important debate on immigration we have seen in a generation.
Say what you will about Donald Trump — and there’s plenty to say — but he may be the first president in memory to actively limit his own branch’s power.
Federalist senior writer Mary Katharine Ham joined “The Lead With Jake Tapper” on CNN Thursday afternoon to discuss Donald Trump’s backroom dealings with “Chuck and Nancy.”
This is the stage some of us have been waiting for: when Trump tacks back to the Left, makes nice with Democrats, and sells out his core supporters.
DACA is not a path to legal residency or U.S. citizenship. It’s only a temporary solution. It’s no different than putting a small Band-Aid on a large wound.
Many young immigrants are taught the immigrant experience can only be one of oppression and anti-capitalism. But it could offer so much more.
Citizenship is not defined by one’s mindset, but by law. That’s the whole reason we’re even having this discussion.
On the Federalist Radio Hour: Cato Institute’s Alex Nowrasteh explains all the chaos surrounding DACA and the variations of the DREAM Act.
Immigration laws serve the moral purpose of regulating entry into the nation and safeguarding against unwanted or dangerous intruders.
It doesn’t matter whether you like DACA or not. When the president makes laws, we justly call that tyranny.
Donald Trump promised to rescind DACA if he won the election. So why does Barack Obama have a problem with Trump following through on his promise?
Political theater or not, DACA is probably unconstitutional. Something the pretend-defenders of law and order might want to remember.
Congress needs to allow existing DACA youths to work and live securely, but no citizenship. We must hold the tension between compassion and deterrence so that others do not follow suit.
This has nothing to do with discrimination against young people brought here illegally. It has everything to do with sound and prudent business practice.
Why is President Trump keeping an Obama-era program that’s delivered thousands of undocumented children into the hands of traffickers?
- What The Shutdown Tells Us About Modern DemocratsFor Democrats, anything the Republicans do is 'undemocrcontinue reading >
- House Intel Committee Democrats Started The False ‘Russia On Facebook’ StoryDemocrats spread a false story, the media picked it up continue reading >
- No, Washington Post, Socrates Was Not A Social Justice WarriorSocial justice warriors are not the heirs of Socrates; continue reading >