The Trump administration ought not to concede one inch to those who wish to sideline the personnel and stifle the policies that would make its counterjihadist agenda a reality.
‘Muslims cannot reform their interpretations of Islam under the boots of regimes that manifest interpretations of Islam through blasphemy, apostasy, and treason laws.’
What unites these two seemingly antithetical movements is their shared desires to accumulate power and topple a common enemy.
The analogue is so close that, reading public statements from the early 1970s and replacing ‘Italian’ with ‘Muslim,’ you’d be hard-pressed to spot the incongruence.
The freakouts when people raise valid questions over Islamist actions are meant to frighten people into silence so Islamists can continue their attacks.
CAIR’s end goal is Muslim communities alienated from law enforcement and the wider American society, totally reliant on Islamist groups like CAIR for representation.
Al Qaeda is “on the run.” ISIS is “contained.” The unraveling of Barack Obama’s national security policy has turned the 44th president into Baghdad Bob.
Blowing up these nonevents is a way to create the perception that discrimination against Muslims is a pervasive problem in American life. It’s not.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations should have no moral authority to discuss Islam in America until it renounces its terrorist ties.
Of the scores of Muslim footballers playing in France and elsewhere in Europe, none have yet spoken up forthrightly about the Paris terrorist attack.
- America Is Over, But I Won’t See It Go Without An Epic FightBarring some unforeseen awakening, America is heading fcontinue reading >
- 4 Key Takeaways From Jim Jefferies’ Interview With Jordan PetersonTwo amazing things happened in these six minutes: A lefcontinue reading >
- I’m Sorry And I Want You Back: One Woman’s Open Letter To Her EyebrowsI don’t have many regrets. But you are among them. I continue reading >