There are only two flaws with antagonistic lawyer Michael Avenatti’s argument for indicting President Trump: It has no basis in fact, and it has no basis in law.
If one of those who work for the administration, or others to whom graciousness and honesty are foreign ideas, did come here, I think I would compromise.
The legitimate arguments the media make about the president’s treatment of them is overshadowed by their unhinged overreaction to the tweets and the jabs.
While the self-labeled remnant challenges conservatives to live up to a higher standard, others counter that we should leverage unified Republican government to secure policy wins.
I do hope alleged Donald Trump paramour Stormy Daniels is Michael Avenatti’s only client, because I find it difficult to believe he’s not neglecting his other cases and clients.
Ideas and persuasion alone are as insufficient to stem the tide of illiberalism sweeping across the country as a few liquor raids were to bringing down Al Capone.
The Left is gaslighting conservatives into thinking President Trump is in a league all on his own and we must believe Democrats’ cries for concern this time, unlike all other times.
Future conservative victories will rest not upon allegiance to Donald Trump, but upon a continued willingness to engage in intellectual inquiry and political persuasion.
As a young man my entire worldview was an attempt to justify my lack of restraint and discipline. So is today’s ‘resistance.’
Jonathan Rauch and Benjamin Wittes see Donald Trump and his political coalition as uniquely dangerous, instead of as symptomatic of crumbling institutions and a declining civic impulse.
The real motives of Rauch, Wittes, and NeverTrumpers have nothing to do with pragmatic politics in response to a ‘dangerous’ president or concern about the rule of law.
Today one of the popular themes of political children’s books is that as soon as you’re born you’re a victim because of your sex or skin color.
Republicans might want to take note—the effort to fund ‘the resistance’ through an online platform is growing and in some cases succeeding.
The Trump supporter has been handled, not with journalism, but with anthropology. That may change soon.
Our day-to-day drama is often brought on by Trump’s words. But much of it is exacerbated by his adversaries, who are ridiculous in their own special ways.
I reached my threshold where no amount of hypothetical Republican bigotry or greed could approach the magnitude of hypocrisy, corruption, or criminality I saw rotting Democrats.
‘Many lawyer groups have actually volunteered, on their own, to file for a court paper to ensure that the security staff will cooperate with us. But we have declined, since this will really look like a coup…’
Of what value are mental health ethics if when they’re tested they crumble under the whims of political pressure?
- CNN Asked Five Women If They Believed Kavanaugh. CNN Didn’t Like Their Answers'In the grand scheme of things, my goodness, there was continue reading >
- Will Unleashing Kavanaugh’s Accuser Suck Away Democrats’ Midterm ‘Blue Wave’?If Christine Blasey Ford doesn’t show up to Monday’continue reading >
- Joe Biden Suggests Me Too Should Mean Assuming Accused Men Are GuiltyIf we are to develop a process of adjudication in the ccontinue reading >