Does an unprovable and uncorroborated allegation that Kavanaugh did a terrible thing as a teenager disqualify him from sitting on the Supreme Court?
Anita Hill’s accusations against Clarence Thomas during his Supreme Court confirmation in many ways parallel those against Brett Kavanaugh.
Senate Republicans have taken unprecedented measures to encourage those who have made accusations against Brett Kavanaugh to share their evidence.
While Christine Blasey Ford’s last-minute accusation upended the Senate Judiciary Committee, with Deborah Ramirez Sen. Charles Grassley and his team were prepared.
There’s no greater sin than condemning an innocent man without evidence. There’s no greater cowardice than caving in to mob pressure.
Christine Blasey Ford’s attorneys have constantly complained about the agreed-upon process, making it look more and more likely that Kavanaugh’s accuser will be a no-show.
The Kavanaugh chaos is not politics as usual, even in the norm-shattering age of Trump. Rather, it is a convergence of the neuroses and contradictions in American culture.
A New York Times article scrutinizing inside jokes in the 1983 yearbook of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s Georgetown Preparatory School hid multiple problems with its claims.
It’s not nice or politically correct to say, but people do sometimes lie to get money, revenge, power, attention, or political advantage. False allegations of assault have been documented.
I cannot accept a world in which my sons will be raised under the tyranny of a lawless, vindictive society that wants to oppress men in the name of equality for women.
If we leave weighing the evidence behind for punishing people based on a ‘reasonable suspicion,’ the left will increase its use of character assassination.
Not only do all four people she’s named as witnesses say Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations are completely false, they all say Brett Kavanaugh would never have done such a thing.
If we are to develop a process of adjudication in the court of public opinion that does not cheapen real accusations by incentivizing false ones, Joe Biden’s voice warrants a rebuttal.
The U.S. judicial system has a process for dealing with allegations of a crime, and Christine Blasey Ford should have to follow it, like any other accuser.
‘They waited until their hearings were over. They waited until they basically put their finger up in the political winds and they knew that Kavanaugh was going to pass.’
If Christine Blasey Ford doesn’t show up to Monday’s hearing, it will hurt the Democratic Party, which has thrown full support behind her without waiting for the facts.
Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, should realize that the far-left tactics of the campus tribunal aren’t going to work in the Senate.
A Senate star chamber full of grandstanding senators on both sides will not elucidate what happened four decades ago, when all people involved were minors, and the accuser is unclear on the details.
When partisan passions are put aside, Brett Kavanaugh’s suggestion provides the most compassionate and reasonable way the competing stories can be reconciled with reality.
When those paid to be well-informed are uninformed, small wonder mischaracterizations of conservative ideas pervade public discourse.
- All The Adults Involved Failed The Covington Catholic School Boys, And Should Be AshamedThe Covington Catholic boys may not have behaved with pcontinue reading >
- People Who Get Social Security Benefits Without Having Children Are Free RidersMaybe people should be expected to retire on a smaller continue reading >
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is Setting Women Back Light Years In PoliticsShe doesn't deserve to be lauded as millennials' feminicontinue reading >