Chicago’s ‘sanctuary’ cities case offers an important opportunity to challenge a dangerous practice of relatively recent advent: granting a nationwide injunction in a local dispute.
Trial has begun for more than 150 young women suing former USA gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar, alleging sexual assault under the guise of medical treatment.
Instead of focusing on campaigns that may have helped this transgender victim, LGBT groups will instead continue fighting a threat that does not exist.
During discovery, the plaintiffs will have the ability to request every document, email, and text concerning politics involving Google’s decision-makers.
Catherine Deneuve and others argue men are losing jobs and reputations for ‘sending sexually charged messages to women who did not return their attentions.’
The woman who accused Liam Allan said he had raped her multiple times over a 14-month period, and that she did not enjoy sex with him. Thousands of her text messages said otherwise.
Sen. Chuck Grassley on Friday referred to DOJ a criminal investigation of Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous dossier alleging collusion between Trump and the Russian government, for providing false information to federal authorities about his activities.
In Fusion GPS’ vague telling, they’ve been nothing but forthright with congressional investigative committees, which came as news to those committees.
The Oregon Court of Appeals upheld a $135,000 fine against the owners of a local cake shop who declined to use their artistic skills to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.
We have divergent interpretive theories that map onto ideologically sorted parties, so is it any surprise that elections are high-stakes for judges?
Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards is right: Courts matter. They matter because liberal judges long ago stopped interpreting the law and started inventing it.
The judge crystalized not just that elections have consequences but that so does the reach of government, legislative abandonment, and the ideology-imposing of unelected judges.
Sexual harassment digests a degenerate thug like Harvey Weinstein with a college student who makes an awkward pass or a well-intentioned boss who compliments a dress.
Monday, the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on whether sexual orientation discrimination is illegal under Title VII.
Did the Washington Post omit significant information about the people behind both the Russian dossier and the Clinton campaign’s opposition research?
Six state attorneys general seek to force the Little Sisters to violate their consciences or pay millions in fines, all without having to face these religious caregivers in a court of law.
While there is always a risk of reading too much into Supreme Court justices’ questions during oral argument, there is often much to be gleaned.
Despite concluding a crime was committed during the use of state resources to target Gov. Scott Walker, Wisconsin’s Justice Department recommends no criminal charges.
Not only is there no constitutional warrant for securing ‘dignity,’ but the equal protection of such a right is impossible. Relying on government to ensure it results in state-imposed orthodoxy.
For all the handwringing about media and morality, God has been largely missing from the conversation we’re having about sexual assault.
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >
- The Media Stopped Reporting The Russia Collusion Story Because They Helped Create ItThe press has played an active role in the Trump-Russiacontinue reading >
- Guess Which Mass Murderers Came From A Fatherless HomeWhenever we face a shooting like the one in Charleston,continue reading >