Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- How The Code Name ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Undermines The FBI’s Russia StoryThe paper of record has apparently joined a campaign, scontinue reading >
- No, Miss, Taking Off Your Clothes Won’t Create Social JusticeIf ‘respectability politics’ is naively misguided, continue reading >
- Why It’s Ridiculous To Say FBI Spying Meant To Protect The Trump CampaignThe decision to use Stefan Halper as an informant instecontinue reading >