Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- Michael Anton’s Attack On Birthright Citizenship Is A DisgraceThere is no justification for ending birthright citizencontinue reading >
- Mob Gets Filmmaker To Apologize For Suggesting Lefties Read Ben ShapiroThe latest Twitter outrage moment reinforces just how dcontinue reading >
- Poll: Americans Don’t Give A Hoot About So-Called Russian CollusionLess than 1 percent of Americans think Russian collusiocontinue reading >