Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- NFL Commissioner: Trump’s Criticism Of NFL Players Who Kneel During Pledge Shows ‘Lack Of Respect’According to a recent J.D. Power survey, over a quartercontinue reading >
- The Confederate Statue Controversy Isn’t About Slavery, It’s About Ending AmericaAttacks on Confederate heritage have quickly evolved incontinue reading >
- This Trial Could Remove a Senator: You’ll Believe What CNN Did NextThe ongoing trial of Sen. Bob Menendez involves multi-mcontinue reading >