Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- The 10 Most Hysterical Liberal Responses To Karen Handel’s Win In GA-6Karen Handel's win in a Georgia special election yestercontinue reading >
- Why The Watergate Comparison Best Fits The Obama AdministrationIs it possible that the machinations in the Nixon admincontinue reading >
- The FBI’s Briefing On The GOP Baseball Shooting Couldn’t Have Been More BizarreThe FBI tried to claim that the shooting at the basebalcontinue reading >