Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- 5 Reforms To Gun Laws That Would Actually Make A DifferenceUnlike proposals from the Left that would not have prevcontinue reading >
- To Avoid Debacles Like Roy Moore, Repeal The 17th AmendmentVoters in Alabama might send Roy Moore to the U.S. Senacontinue reading >
- Are Red States Tax Takers And Blue States Tax Makers?Against a national average of $1,935 in intergovernmentcontinue reading >