Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- How Misguided Environmentalism Is To Blame For California’s WildfiresThe saddest part about these fires in California is thacontinue reading >
- School Punishes Male Teacher For Refusing To Watch A Naked Girl In The Boys’ Locker RoomA Florida school district allowed a self-described trancontinue reading >
- The Bishops In Their LabyrinthThe U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops met in Baltimorcontinue reading >